This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: new left review 61 jan feb 2010 29 mike davis W H O W I L L B U I L D T H E A R K ? W hat follows is rather like the famous courtroom scene in Orson Welles’s The Lady from Shanghai (1947). 1 In that noir allegory of proletarian virtue in the embrace of ruling-class decadence, Welles plays a leftwing sailor named Michael O’Hara who rolls in the hay with femme fatale Rita Hayworth, and then gets framed for murder. Her husband, Arthur Bannister, the most celebrated criminal lawyer in America, played by Everett Sloane, convinces O’Hara to appoint him as his defence, all the better to ensure his rival’s conviction and execution. At the turn- ing point in the trial, decried by the prosecution as ‘yet another of the great Bannister’s famous tricks’, Bannister the attorney calls Bannister the aggrieved husband to the witness stand and interrogates himself in rapid schizoid volleys, to the mirth of the jury. In the spirit of Lady from Shanghai , this essay is organized as a debate with myself, a mental tournament between analytic despair and utopian possibility that is per- sonally, and probably objectively, irresolvable. In the Frst section, ‘Pessimism of the Intellect’, I adduce arguments for believing that we have already lost the Frst, epochal stage of the bat- tle against global warming. The Kyoto Protocol, in the smug but sadly accurate words of one of its chief opponents, has done ‘nothing meas- urable’ about climate change. Global carbon dioxide emissions rose by the same amount they were supposed to fall because of it. 2 It is highly unlikely that greenhouse gas accumulation can be stabilized this side of the famous ‘red line’ of 450 ppm by 2020. If this is the case, the most heroic efforts of our children’s generation will be unable to fore- stall a radical reshaping of ecologies, water resources and agricultural systems. In a warmer world, moreover, socio-economic inequality will have a meteorological mandate, and there will be little incentive for the rich northern hemisphere countries, whose carbon emissions have 30 nlr 61 destroyed the climate equilibrium of the Holocene, to share resources for adaptation with those poor subtropical countries most vulnerable to droughts and ﬂoods. The second part of the essay, ‘Optimism of the Imagination’, is my self- rebuttal. I appeal to the paradox that the single most important cause of global warming—the urbanization of humanity—is also potentially the principal solution to the problem of human survival in the later twenty- Frst century. Left to the dismal politics of the present, of course, cities of poverty will almost certainly become the cofFns of hope; but all the more reason that we must start thinking like Noah. Since most of his- tory’s giant trees have already been cut down, a new Ark will have to be constructed out of the materials that a desperate humanity Fnds at hand in insurgent communities, pirate technologies, bootlegged media, rebel science and forgotten utopias.science and forgotten utopias....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 10/16/2011 for the course SOC 30 18 taught by Professor Schmitt during the Spring '11 term at UC Riverside.
- Spring '11