This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Error Correcting Codes: Combinatorics, Algorithms and Applications (Fall 2007) Lecture 3: Error Correction and Distance August 31, 2007 Lecturer: Atri Rudra Scribe: Michael Pfetsch & Atri Rudra The following topics were discussed in the last lecture: • Shannon and Hamming noise models. • The C 3 ,rep repetition code can correct ≤ 1 errors and has a rate of R = 1 3 . • The C ⊕ parity code cannot correct even 1 error and has a rate of R = 4 5 . The last two points confirmed our intuition that one can correct more errors if the underlying code has more redundancy. In today’s lecture we will look a bit more closely at the parity code C ⊕ , which among other things will motivate another important parameter of codes called the distance . 1 A closer look at C ⊕ Last lecture we saw that C ⊕ cannot correct even 1 error. However, we will now see that C ⊕ can detect one error. Consider the following algorithm. Let y = ( y 1 , y 2 , y 3 , y 4 , y 5 ) be the received word– compute b = y 1 ⊕ y 2 ⊕ y 3 ⊕ y 4 ⊕ y 5 and declare an error if b = 1 . Note that when no error has occurred during transmission, y i = x i for 1 ≤ i ≤ 4 and y 5 = x 1 ⊕ x 2 ⊕ x 3 ⊕ x 4 , in which case b = 0 as required. If there is a single error then either y i = x i ⊕ 1 (for exactly one 1 ≤ i ≤ 4 ) or y 5 = x 1 ⊕ x 2 ⊕ x 3 ⊕ x 4 ⊕ 1 . It is easy to check that in this case b = 1 . In fact, one can extend this argument to to obtain the following result. Proposition 1.1. The parity code C ⊕ can detect an odd number of errors. Let us now revisit the example that showed that one cannot correct 1 error using C ⊕ . Consider the two codewords in C ⊕ , u = 00000 and v = 10001 (which are codewords corresponding to mes sages 0000 and 1000 respectively). Now consider the two scenarios when u and v are transmitted and a single error occurs resulting in the received word r = 10000 in both cases. Now given the received word r and the fact that at most one error can occur, the decoder has no way of knowing whether the original transmitted codeword was u or v . Looking back at the example, it is clear that the decoder gets “confused” because the two codewords u and v do not differ in a lot of positions....
View
Full
Document
 Spring '10
 Rejaei
 Electromagnet

Click to edit the document details