MIT6_235S10_hw05_sol

# MIT6_235S10_hw05_sol - ¯ 6.253 Convex Analysis and...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ¯ 6.253: Convex Analysis and Optimization Homework 5 Prof. Dimitri P. Bertsekas Spring 2010, M.I.T. Problem 1 Consider the convex programming problem minimize f ( x ) x subject to x ∈ X, g ( x ) ≤ , of Section 5.3, and assume that the set X is described by equality and inequality constraints as X = { x | h i ( x ) = 0 , i = 1 ,..., ¯ = r + 1 ,..., r ¯ } . m, g j ( x ) ≤ , j Then the problem can alternatively be described without an abstract set constraint, in terms of all of the constraint functions h i ( x ) = 0 , i = 1 ,..., ¯ g j ( x ) ≤ , r. m, j = 1 ,..., ¯ We call this the extended representation of (P). Show if there is no duality gap and there exists a dual optimal solution for the extended representation, the same is true for the original problem. Solution . Assume that there exists a dual optimal solution in the extended representation. Thus there exist nonnegative scalars λ ∗ 1 ,...,λ ∗ ,λ ∗ m 1 ,...,µ ∗ ,µ ∗ r ¯ m +1 ,...,λ ∗ ¯ and µ ∗ r +1 ,...,µ ∗ such that m r ⎧ ⎨ ⎫ ⎬ r ¯ m f ∗ = inf f ( x ) + λ ∗ i h i ( x ) + µ ∗ j g j ( x ) ⎭ x ∈ R n ⎩ , i =1 j =1 from which we have m ¯ r ¯ f ∗ ≤ f ( x ) + λ i ∗ h i ( x ) + µ ∗ j g j ( x ) , ∀ x ∈ R n . i =1 j =1 For any x ∈ X , we have h i ( x ) = 0 for all i = 1 ,..., m ¯ , and g j ( x ) ≤ for all j = r + 1 ,..., r ¯, so that µ ∗ j g j ( x ) ≤ for all j = r + 1 ,..., r ¯. Therefore, it follows from the preceding relation that r f ∗ ≤ f ( x ) + µ ∗ j g j ( x ) , ∀ x ∈ X. j =1 1 Taking the infimum over all x ∈ X , it follows that ⎧ ⎨ ⎫ ⎬ ⎭ r f ( x ) + µ ∗ j g j ( x ) f ∗ ≤ inf x ∈ X ⎩ j =1 ⎧ ⎨ ⎫ ⎬ ≤ inf x ∈ X,g j ( x ) ≤ , j =1 ,...,r ⎩ f ( x ) + r j =1 µ ∗ j g j ( x ) ⎭ inf f ( x ) ≤ x ∈ X, h i ( x )=0 , i =1 ,...,m g j ( x ) ≤ , j =1 ,...,r = f ∗ . Hence, equality holds throughout above, showing that the scalars λ ∗ 1 ,...,λ ∗ , µ ∗ 1 ,...,µ ∗ constitute m r a dual optimal solution for the original representation. Problem 2 Consider the class of problems minimize f ( x ) x subject to x ∈ X, g j ( x ) ≤ u j , j = 1 , . . . , r, where u = ( u 1 ,...,u r ) is a vector parameterizing the right-hand side of the constraints. Given two distinct values u ¯ and ˜ u of u , let f ¯ and f ˜ be the corresponding...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 7

MIT6_235S10_hw05_sol - ¯ 6.253 Convex Analysis and...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online