he real value of diversity - he real value of diversity...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
he real value of diversity connections , winter 2002 What does it mean to live in a multicultural society? Few questions have been posed more sharply by the events of the past year from the riots in Bradford, Burnley and Oldham to the aftermath of the events of September 11. There have, in recent months, been two broad responses to this question. For some the violence between whites and Asians in the northern mill towns, and the seeming rejection by some British Muslims of the core values of their chosen country, all reveal the failure of the liberal dream of cohesive, tolerant multicultural society. Writing in the Spectator , Enoch Powell's biographer Simon Heffer suggested that Powell's forebodings about the future of Britain have been borne out. Powell's infamous 'rivers of blood' speech, Heffer wrote, 'can, and should, be seen as the first blast of the trumpet against the dangers of multiculturalism'. Despite Heffer's advocacy, Powell's little Englander attitudes carry little currency these days. The dominant view is that the events of the past year reveal even more clearly the need for a tolerant multiculturalism, in which all people can enjoy their own culture, while respecting those of others. Both these responses are, I believe, flawed. One embodies a vision of British (or, more usually, English) identity pickled in aspic. It is a notion of identity rooted in John Major's bucolic vision of 'old maids on bicycles and cricketers playing on the village green'. The other response has abandoned the very notion of a common identity or of shared values except at a most minimal level. Britishness is simply the toleration of cultural diversity. What both sides in the debate fail to recognise is that shared values and common identities can only emerge through a process of political dialogue and struggle, a process whereby different values are put to the test, and a collective language of citizenship emerges. Shared values cannot, as Heffer believes, be rooted in a mythical past, in an England that does not exist and probably never did. But the wrongness of the Powellite argument does not make the proponents of multiculturalism right. A cohesive notion of citizenship cannot be based simply on the idea that we should respect other people's values. It requires a positive articulation of the values to which we should all aspire. In December both the home secretary David Blunkett, and a raft of reports on the inner city riots, attempted to address this problem of 'Britishness'. Blunkett suggested that immigrants should be required to speak English and urged ethnic minorities to become 'more British'. The Home Office-sponsored report into the riots, chaired by Ted Cantle, recommended that all immigrants be required to swear an 'oath of allegiance' to Britain. David Ritchie, author of the independent report on the Oldham riots, criticised the 'self-
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/16/2011 for the course ENGLISH 101 taught by Professor Parkin during the Summer '11 term at Wilfred Laurier University .

Page1 / 5

he real value of diversity - he real value of diversity...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online