class 5

class 5 - Master servant Ratification re stefanowicz Agent...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Master servant Ratification re stefanowicz Agent must have acted on behalf of principle (or purported to) 4.04 talks about principle’s capacity to authorize and must be there to authorize On boticcello, she didn’t propely affirm the contract b/c she didn’t have all the facts and her husband didn’t actually purport to have authority to act on her behalf, so 2 grounds to reject the agency relationship §220 of rest lays out factors to determine agency use totality of circumstances In humble oil compny was residual claimant b/c held title to inventory in the store Master liable for all torts w/n scope of employment §219 §228 determines scope of employment is of kind he is employed to perform It occurs substantially w/n the authorized time and space limits It is actuated at least in part by a purpose to serve the master If force is unintentionally used by servant aginst another use f force is not unexpectable by the master Master may be liable if servant acted outside scope per §219 Certain activies can be construed as w/n scope even if not subject to principle’s control…ex if servant is reasonably expected to perform while carrying out master’s task
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

class 5 - Master servant Ratification re stefanowicz Agent...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online