Inside Information

Inside Information - Insider trading Inside Information Goodwin v Agassiz Didnt find liability relevance of type of information(it was just a

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Insider trading: Inside Information: Goodwin v Agassiz Didn’t find liability… relevance of type of information (it was just a theory…highly speculative ‘at most a hope”) implication was that if it was more certain, court may have imposed duty. No fraud b/c no face to face transaction it was on open securities maret. If director personally sought out buyer, transaction would have been closely scrutinized. Securities act = IPO’s etc Securities exchange act = disclosure about securities on an exchange. SEC v Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. Did tgs have to dislcse discovery? No entitled to keep quiet till it bought surrounding land… business judgment protection for disclosure. Court used disclose or abstain rule to find insider info. Everyone should have access to same info before trading Rule applies to anyone w/ material non-public info regardless of insider status or not. EQUAL ACCESS!! Is equal access desirable? Very broad! Disclose or abstain applies to everyone! Not the law today!! Insider could trade on inside info after news has achieved wide distribution. Can’t issue false/misleading info…either no-comment or tell truth…as long as people buy/sell based on that info. Chiarella v US: SC said no violation b/c he was not an insider fo the corporation The duty to abstain from trading unless all material inside info is disclosed arises from relationship of trust b/t corp’s shareholders and its employees. 470 problems: 1. Owes no fiduciary duty to Cousin 2. Would be liable if she was misleading/fraudulent 10b-5 laibility and state common law liability 3. Secret profit issue. Rose probably does have a fiduciary relationship to her principal (George) need to look at agency agreement Juan betty problem: 1. Partnership owes fiduciary duty to eachother. State partnership law liability 2. If there is fraud, there is 10b-5 as well as the common law protections 3. If juan only has a tenuous theory, under state common law, no duty to disclose
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/18/2011 for the course LAW 700 taught by Professor Kim during the Spring '10 term at USC.

Page1 / 3

Inside Information - Insider trading Inside Information Goodwin v Agassiz Didnt find liability relevance of type of information(it was just a

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online