Meeting the Challenges of Strategic andHuman Security Interests in US–AfricaRelations, or the Orphaning of‘Soft Power’?Edmond J. KellerIn the context of a changed global environment since the end of the cold war, Africa hasassumed renewed importance in the foreign policy calculations of the USA. Moreover,the security interests of the USA and African states could be seen as converging. One ofthe major goals of US foreign policy is combating international terrorism, while Africaas a whole is vulnerable as a breeding ground and incubation site for international ter-rorists. Indeed, international terrorism thrives amidst poverty and underdevelopment,and nowhere is this more the case than in present-day Africa. What this represents forthe continent is both a strategic and a human security challenge; and, given thecurrent circumstances, it would seem reasonable to suggest that the USA and Africashould enter into wider partnerships to overcome the vulnerabilities African countriesface in coping with these challenges, both strategic and human security. Unless theUSA makes a concerted effort to commit substantial material, technical, and humanresources in its relations with Africa, the root causes of domestic conflict and inter-national terrorism in the African region and in the world will continue to be majorimpediments to political and economic development and democracy, and thus to theAfrica Review4, 1, 2013: 1–16African Studies Association of India, New DelhiEdmond J. Kelleris a distinguished Professor of Political Science and Chair, Department of PoliticalScience, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Director of the UCLA Globalisation ResearchCenter-Africa, and former Director of the James S Coleman African Studies Center at UCLA. He special-ises in comparative politics with an emphasis on Africa, and his research focuses on political transitions,cultural pluralism, and nationalism, and conflict and conflict management in Africa.
achievement of USA’s vital strategic security interests and the strategic and humansecurity of African nations.Simultaneously with the ending of the cold war—or because of its ending—aca-demics and foreign policy advisers in the USA began to push hard for the government toemphasise and develop its capacity for‘soft power’(Nye, 1990, 1994). This was sup-posed to entail the USA recognising that the world has changed—and even thoughits own interests are perceived to befirst and foremost strategic, these interests cannotbe achieved by force alone. No longer was the country locked in an ideological battlewith the Soviet Union and Communist China (the People’s Republic of China(PRC)). To the extent that there was still global competition, the locus of this relation-ship had shifted to the economic and socio-political realms. In order to win new friendsand regain the support and admiration of former allies, it was argued that the USA wasgoing to have to listen more carefully than it had become accustomed to.
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
End of preview. Want to read all 16 pages?
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
Term
Spring
Professor
3432
Tags
Africa Review, US Africa Command