Unformatted text preview: state, it became inherently dangerous, which makes Coca-Cola liable. 14. Fredericks is liable for his dog’s actions because his dog is inherently dangerous. So even if Fredericks did everything he could to prevent his dog from harming others, it doesn’t change the fact that his dog is inherently dangerous. Therefore, Fredericks is liable for his dog’s actions....
View Full Document
- Fall '11
- Tort Law, puddle, Fredericks, dog’s actions