week13_lecture12 - 21M011(spring 2006 Ellen T Harris...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
21M011 (spring, 2006) Ellen T. Harris Lecture XII American Modernism A truly distinctive American voice in classical music only began to arise at the end of the nineteenth century in conjunction with the movement toward nationalism. Charles Ives (b. 1874) is as avant-garde, if not more so, as any composer we have studied. His experimental and anti-traditional tendencies were furthered in the work of Varèse (b. 1883) and Cage (b. 1912). At the same time, his attachment to the incorporation of American folk tunes, dances and hymns found resonance in the music of Copland (b. 1900). American jazz began to develop around the same time as nationalism (beginning with ragtime [Scott Joplin (b. 1868)] and continuing with contributions from some of the greats represented in Kerman: Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, Charlie Parker and Miles Davis). Jazz had a huge impact on classical music in Europe and America. Gershwin (b. 1898) and Bernstein (b. 1918) were both strongly influenced by jazz. Bernstein also wrote music that carried political and social critiques ( West Side Story is an example). Crumb (b. 1929) expands the sound structures of music to create sound images, some of which (like Black Angels ) are highly politicized. Reich (b. 1936) deliberately reduces his musical materials, using simple melodic material and repeated rhythmic motives (minimalism), creating a kind of hypnotic sensation. (Minimalistic operas by Philip Glass and John Adams have continued to explore political themes.) Ives, The Rockstrewn Hills (1909) K 4:36-37 This movement from Ives’s 2 nd Orchestral Set falls into a kind-of rondo form, where fragments of recognizable tunes (dance, cakewalk, march) are rejected until the hymn tune comes in. The fragmentation is reminiscent of the Funeral March from Mahler’s Symphony No. 1, 3 rd movement. Mahler provides a narrative: first one hears the funeral march (“Frère Jacques” in minor); this fades into a section with fragments of dance phrases (from the Jewish klezmer tradition), which seem to be memories of happy moments with the deceased; the funeral march cuts back in briefly, leading to a real song of mourning; finally the funeral march resumes. (Mahler and Ives were not far apart in age; they were born respectively in 1860 and 1874.) Ives’s fragmentation is less nostalgic than Mahler’s and more dismissive, moving through various types of popular music until accepting the hymn tune. In its rejection of motives, the Ives movement is more like the last movement of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, where the cellos and basses (in effect) call for music, but angrily reject fragmented reprises of the first three movements in turn. Finally, they accept the “Ode to Joy” (hymn/chorale), which then becomes the basis of an extensive set of variations. Copland,
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/23/2011 for the course MUSIC 189 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '07 term at MIT.

Page1 / 6

week13_lecture12 - 21M011(spring 2006 Ellen T Harris...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online