handout9

# handout9 - ISyE8843A Brani Vidakovic 1 Handout 9 Bayesian...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

ISyE8843A, Brani Vidakovic Handout 9 1 Bayesian Computation. If the selection of an adequate prior was the major conceptual and modeling challenge of Bayesian analysis, the major implementational challenge is computation. As soon as the model deviates from the conjugate structure, ﬁnding the posterior (ﬁrst the marginal) distribution and the Bayes rule is all but simple. A closed form solution is more an exception than the rule, and even for such closed form solutions, lucky mathematical coincidences, convenient mixtures, and other “tricks” are needed. Up to this point I believe you got a sense of this calculational challenge. If classical statistics relies on optimization, Bayesian statistics relies on integration. The marginal needed for the posterior is an integral m ( x ) = Z Θ f ( x | θ ) π ( θ ) dθ, and the Bayes estimator of h ( θ ) , with respect to the squared error loss is a ratio of integrals, δ π ( x ) = Z Θ h ( θ ) π ( θ | x ) = R Θ h ( θ ) f ( x | θ ) π ( θ ) R Θ f ( x | θ ) π ( θ ) . The difﬁculties in calculating the above Bayes rule are that (i) the posterior cannot be represented in a ﬁnite form, and (ii) the integral of h ( θ ) does not have a closed form integral under the possibly closed form posterior distribution. Adopting a different loss function usually makes calculation even more difﬁcult. An exception is absolute loss for which the Bayes rule is the mode of the posterior, and the mode is not inﬂuenced by normalizing (trouble making) constant, m ( x ) . The last two decades of research in Bayesian statistics contributed to tremendous broadening of the scope of Bayesian models. Models that could not be handled before are now routinely solved. This is done by Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Methods, and their introduction to the ﬁeld of statistics revolutionized Bayesian statistics. This handout overviews pre MCMC techniques: Monte Carlo Integration, Importance Sampling, and Analytic Approximations (Riemann, Laplace, and Saddlepoint). 1.1 Bayesian CLT Suppose that X 1 ,X 2 ,...,X n f ( x | θ ) , where θ is p -dimensional parameter, and that the prior on θ is π ( θ ) . The prior π ( θ ) could be improper, but we assume that the posterior is proper and that its mode exists. Then, when n → ∞ , [ θ | x ] → MVN p ( θ M ,H - 1 ( θ M )) , where θ M is posterior mode, i.e., a solution of ∂π * ( θ | x ) ∂θ i = 0 , i = 1 ,...,p, where π * ( θ | x ) = f ( x | θ ) π ( θ ) is non-normalized posterior. Let H be the Hessian deﬁned as H ( θ ) = - ± 2 π * ( θ | x ) ∂θ i ∂θ j . 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
The asymptotic covariance matrix is H - 1 ( θ M ) = ( H ( θ )) - 1 | θ = θ M The proof can be found in standard texts on asymptotic theory. Example: Bernoulli’s.
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

## This note was uploaded on 10/23/2011 for the course ISYE 8843 taught by Professor Vidakovic during the Spring '11 term at Georgia Tech.

### Page1 / 7

handout9 - ISyE8843A Brani Vidakovic 1 Handout 9 Bayesian...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online