MIT18_03S10_2ex

MIT18_03S10_2ex - 2. Higher-order Linear ODE’s 2A....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 2. Higher-order Linear ODE’s 2A. Second-order Linear ODE’s: General Properties 2A-1. On the right below is an abbreviated form of the ODE on the left: (*) y + p ( x ) y + q ( x ) y = r ( x ) Ly = r ( x ) ; where L is the differential operator : L = D 2 + p ( x ) D + q ( x ) . a) If u 1 and u 2 are any two twice-differentiable functions, and c is a constant, then L ( u 1 + u 2 ) = L ( u 1 ) + L ( u 2 ) and L ( c u ) = c L ( u ) . Operators which have these two properties are called linear . Verify that L is linear, i.e., that the two equations are satisfied. b) Show that if y p is a solution to (*), then all other solutions to (*) can be written in the form y = y c + y p , where y c is a solution to the associated homogeneous equation Ly = 0. 2A-2. a) By eliminating the constants, find a second-order linear homogeneous ODE whose x + c 2 e 2 x general solution is y = c 1 e . b) Verify for this ODE that the IVP consisting of the ODE together with the initial conditions y ( x ) = y , y ( x ) = y y , y constants is always solvable. 2A-3. a) By eliminating the constants, find a second-order linear homogeneous ODE whose y = c 1 x + c 2 x 2 general solution is . b) Show that there is no solution to the ODE you found in part (a) which satisfies the initial conditions y (0) = 1 , y (0) = 1 . c) Why doesn’t part (b) contradict the existence theorem for solutions to second-order linear homogeneous ODE’s? (Book: Theorem 2, p. 110.) 2A-4. Consider the ODE y + p ( x ) y + q ( x ) y = 0. a) Show that if p and q are continuous for all x , a solution whose graph is tangent to the x-axis at some point must be identically zero, i.e., zero for all x . b) Find an equation of the above form having x 2 as a solution, by calculating its derivatives and finding a linear equation connecting them. Why isn’t part (a) contradicted, since the function x 2 has a graph tangent to the x axis at 0? 1 2 18.03 EXERCISES 2A-5. Show that the following pairs of functions are linearly independent, by calculating their Wronskian. m 1 x m 2 x mx a) e , e , m 1 = m 2 b) e , xe mx (can m = 0?) ⇒ 2A-6. Consider y 1 = x 2 and y 2 = x | x | . (Sketch the graph of y 2 .) a) Show that W ( y 1 , y 2 ) (i.e., is identically zero). b) Show that y 1 and y 2 are not linearly dependent on any interval ( a, b ) containing 0. Why doesn’t this contradict theorem 3b, p. 116 in your book? 2A-7. Let y 1 and y 2 be two solutions of y + p ( x ) y + q ( x ) y = 0. dW a) Prove that = − p ( x ) W , where W = W ( y 1 , y 2 ), the Wronskian. dx b) Prove that if p ( x ) = 0, then W ( y 1 , y 2 ) is always a constant. c) Verify (b) by direct calculation for y + k 2 y = 0 , k = 0, whose general solution is ⇒ y 1 = c 1 sin kx + c 2 cos kx ....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/21/2011 for the course MATH 18.03 taught by Professor Vogan during the Fall '09 term at MIT.

Page1 / 9

MIT18_03S10_2ex - 2. Higher-order Linear ODE’s 2A....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online