Cross-Border Business Combinations

Cross-Border Business Combinations - SeptemberOctober 2010...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
5 September–October 2010 I NTERNATIONAL T AX J OURNAL Patrick Jackman is a Partner with Weil, Gotshal & Manges. Cross-Border Business Combinations By Patrick Jackman and Philip Tretiak Cross-Border Acquisitions Get More Expensive: New Legislation Would Limit FTCs in “Covered Asset Acquisitions” * Philip Tretiak is a Managing Director with the Mergers & Acquisitions group of Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s investment banking division. T he Education Jobs and Medicaid Assistance Act of 2010 (“H.R. 1586”) enacted Code Sec. 901(m) (Act Sec. 212), which disallows a foreign tax credit for the disqualiF ed portion of any foreign income tax paid or accrued in connection with a “cov- ered asset acquisition.” 1 The prior proposed versions of this legislation generated signiF cant criticism from commentators, 2 most of whom particularly objected to the lack of prior debate before this provision was F rst included as part of H.R. 4213. 3 This lack of prior debate and discussion 4 makes uncertain the intended scope of new Code Sec. 901(m). 5 ±rom a broader policy perspective, Code Sec. 901(m) likely reduces the ability of potential U.S. acquirors to compete with non-U.S. acquirors for foreign target companies. Overview The term “covered asset acquisition” expressly in- cludes the following transactions: (1) a qualifying purchase of a corporation’s stock that is treated as a purchase of the corporation’s assets pursuant to a Code Sec. 338 election; (2) the purchase of a part- nership interest that results in a proportionate part of the partnership’s assets receiving a fair market value basis pursuant to a Code Sec. 754 election, and (3) any transaction that is treated as the purchase of an entity’s assets for U.S. tax purposes but as a stock ac- quisition for foreign tax purposes. Also, the Treasury would have the authority to identify “any other similar transaction” to these speciF ed deemed asset purchase
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
6 © 2010 CCH. All Rights Reserved Cross-Border Business Combinations transactions. 6 In summary, the focus is on transactions that result in an increase to the basis of assets for U.S. tax purposes without a corresponding increase (or cost) for foreign tax purposes. 7 Before discussing this legislative change in more detail, it may be useful to brieF y review the history of deemed asset purchase transactions, especially Code Sec. 338 transactions, and the foreign tax credit mechanism. Background Brief History of Code Sec. 338 The Kimbell-Diamond doctrine 8 provided that a stock purchase, followed by a liquidation of the purchased corporation, would be treated as an asset purchase. As such, the buyer obtained a cost basis in the assets of the purchased corporation, rather than a carryover basis, which generally would have occurred if the two-step transaction had not been collapsed into an asset purchase. In an effort to provide a statutory regime, Congress enacted Code Sec. 334(b)(2), which had allowed a corporate purchaser of target stock to liquidate the target tax-free within two years of the
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/22/2011 for the course ACCOUNTING ACC565 taught by Professor Lindachess during the Spring '10 term at Strayer.

Page1 / 7

Cross-Border Business Combinations - SeptemberOctober 2010...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online