ssrn-id799584 - Rational Choice Scientific Method and...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Rational Choice, Scientific Method and Social Scientism Bongo Adi a a Regional Economic Development, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Japan Kenneth M. Amaeshi b b Warwick Business School, Coventry, United Kingdom Suminori Tokunaga a Abstract The eighteenth-century introduction of the scientific method of the natural sciences to the study of social phenomena draws a line between moral philosophy – that as- pect of ancient and medieval philosophy that dealt with social issues – and the social sciences as known today. From the onset, the emerging social science, or rather, its epistemological orientation to ‘social scientism,’ was vigorously challenged by many critics who saw it as a reductionist and mechanistic understanding of human beings and their society. In recent times, this criticism has narrowed down to the critique of the rationalist assumptions or rational choice theory on which much of social sci- entism is built. Critics of the natural science ideal in the social sciences argue that the subject matter of the social sciences – human beings, their society and interac- tions – is so complex and different a system that subjecting it to the crucible of the scientific method of the natural, positivist sciences not only limits its understanding but leaves it with an abrasive and distorting impact. In the same manner, critiques of rational choice theory argue that it is a reductionism that does not account for a significant proportion of human actions and motives. What seems to be advocated for is a sort of social science method that addresses the shortcomings of the scientific method applied to social phenomena and employs a more robust model of human action that supersedes the rational choice model. This paper however posits that rationalist assumptions or rational choice theory is not peculiar to social scientism but lies at the foundation of modern and contemporary science and its method. We trace out the centrality of individual rationality assumptions in the general epis- temology of the scientific method and social scienticism within the context of the centuries-old debate on the limitations of the scientific method in the social sciences. Our thesis hints at the impossibility of a modern and contemporary scientific model of either nature (physics) or society that does not assume individualist or subjective rationality. 7 September 2005 Key words: Scientific method, social scientism, rational choice theory 1 Rationality in Science It is often said that the distinctive feature of the Enlightenment, which rev- olutionized science and accumulation of technological capabilities, lies in its exaltation of human reason, that is, rationality. The emphasis on reason, ac- cording to this thinking, distinguished the resulting modern science from what had preceded in the ancient and medieval era. While this is true, it is only part of the story. A philosophical excursus into the nature and process of scienceof the story....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/24/2011 for the course SCIENCE PHY 453 taught by Professor Barnard during the Winter '11 term at BYU.

Page1 / 19

ssrn-id799584 - Rational Choice Scientific Method and...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online