Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: CHAPTER 9: APPLICATIONS OF LOCAL FIELDS PETE L. CLARK The topological groups GL n ( R ) and GL n ( C ) have an inexhaustibly rich structure and importance in all parts of modern mathematics: analysis, geometry, topology, representation theory, number theory....The serious study of these groups was al- ready begun in the 19th century by Lie and his contemporaries. Somewhat more recently (say, about 1950) it has been realized that for a non- Archimedean locally compact field K , the groups GL n ( K ) also have a rich and useful structure. We will give some of this structure theory here: namely, we will classify the maxi- mal compact subgroups of GL n ( K ) for K a nondiscrete locally compact field. This has immediate applications to the structure of finite subgroups of GL n ( Q ), which are of intrinsic interest and are quite useful in areas like representation theory and modular and automorphic forms. Moreover, this material (actually, a small piece of it suffices) can be combined with a beautiful embedding theorem of J.W.S. Cassels to deduce a celebrated 1960 theorem of A. Selberg: for any field K of characteristic 0, a finitely generated subgroup of GL n ( K ) is virtually torsionfree: i.e., has a finite index subgroup without any nontrivial elements of finite order. 1. General linear groups over locally compact fields 1.1. GL n ( K ) is a locally compact group. Let K be a nondiscrete locally com- pact field, and let n be a positive integer. We consider the group GL n ( K ) of invertible n n matrices with coefficients in K . We wish to endow GL n ( K ) with a natural locally compact topology. There are in fact two natural ways to do this, which, happily, lead to the same result. For any n Z + , we endow the Cartesian product K n with the product topology, which of course makes it a locally compact topological group. We will sometimes refer to this topology on K n and other topologies induced from it as the analytic topology , to distinguish it from the Zariski topology. (However, the reader need not know what the Zariski topology is in order to read these notes.) Let M n ( K ) be the ring of n n matrices with entries in K . As a K-vector space, M n ( K ) = K n 2 , and we give it the topology pulled back from the analytic topology on K n 2 via the isomorphism. (Easy exercise: the topology we get on M n ( K ) is independent of the chosen basis.) Now GL n ( K ) is a subset of M n ( K ). We claim that in the induced (subspace) topology it is locally compact, and indeed this is foisted off on the reader in the 1 2 PETE L. CLARK form of the following straightforward exercises. Exercise 9.1: Let P ( t 1 ,...,t n ) K [ t 1 ,...,t n ] be a polynomial, thought of as an algebraic object. Then P induces a function P : K n K in the usual way: ( x 1 ,...,x n ) 7 P ( x 1 ,...,x n ). Show that P is continuous for the analytic topolo- gies on K n and K ....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/26/2011 for the course MATH 8410 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '11 term at University of Georgia Athens.

Page1 / 13


This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online