10:31:08 law

10:31:08 law - Highly tenuous decision, 5-4 decision...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
17:42 Conservatives and Liberals NAACP v. Button Case The NAACP paid lawyers to represent the plaintiff in a racial discrimination case Virginia court said it was not a fine thing to do The lawyers were compensated by the NAACP It is illegal for an organization to assign lawyers The states wants to avoid unethical groups from soliciting criminals Compelling rational Substantive due process Bakke v. California Discrimination based on race
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
Background image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Highly tenuous decision, 5-4 decision (4-4-1) 4 justices voted to strike down quotas, and its against const. 4 other justices said that it is appropriate for a school to set racial quotas because of a greater public good pall said we live in a diverse community and people are going to want to go and see doctors for lots of different reasons, no quotas but there is a consideration hardberg plan 17:42 17:42...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 10/26/2011 for the course LAWPOL 106 at Rutgers.

Page1 / 3

10:31:08 law - Highly tenuous decision, 5-4 decision...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online