Math135Lecture05StudentNotes

Math135Lecture05StudentNotes - Math 135: Lecture 5:...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Math 135: Lecture 5: Existential Quantifiers 2 The Construction Method Definition 5.1. Two integers a and b are coprime if gcd( a,b ) = 1. Proposition 5.2 (Coprimeness and Divisibility ( CAD )) . If a , b and c Z and c | ab and gcd( a,c ) = 1, then c | b . Where is the existential quantifier? Its hidden - in the definition of divides . An integer m divides an integer n , and we write m | n , if Construct Method When proving that A implies B and B uses an existential quantifier, work as follows. Construct an object with certain properties such that something happens. Be sure that the object constructed is within the universe of discourse. The construction of the object is not adequate for a proof. Show that the object has the certain properties and that something happens. Structure of an Existential Statement CAD : If a , b and c Z and c | ab and gcd( a,c ) = 1, then c | b ....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/27/2011 for the course MATH 135 taught by Professor Andrewchilds during the Fall '08 term at Waterloo.

Page1 / 3

Math135Lecture05StudentNotes - Math 135: Lecture 5:...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online