This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.976 High Speed Communication Circuits and Systems Spring 2003 Homework #4: Narrowband LNA's and Mixers c Copyright 2003 by Michael H. Perrott Reading: Chapters 11 and 12 of Thomas H. Lee's book. Chapter 6 and pages 138146 of Behzad Razavi's book. 1. This problem will focus on design of the LNA shown in Figure 1. In the figure, Ldeg (Ls ) is assumed to have infinite Q, but inductors Lg and Ld have associated resistances due to their finite Q (i.e., the values of Rpg and Rpd are set by the Q and inductance value of Lg and Ld , respectively). Assume the following Design of the LNA should be focused on its performance at frequency wo = (2)2.5 GHz If an external inductor is used for Lg , its Q is 40. For integrated inductors, assume the Q to be 5 (other than for Ldeg ). The LNA input impedance, Zin , must be designed to match that of the source resistance of 50 Ohms at frequency wo (Note: assume Cbig is a short at frequency wo , and ignore the influence of the 5 kOhm bias resistor) The power dissipation of the core amplifier must be no greater than 10 mW. (Ignore the bias circuitry here) All transistor devices are the same size and have length L=0.18 m The influence of the cascode device M2 can be ignored for noise figure and gain calculations. Ignore Cgd , Cdb , ro , and backgate effects for all transistors. Ignore the noise contribution of transistors M2 and M3 and the 5 k bias resistor. Assume the following process parameters c = j0.55 =3 =6 gm /gdo = 0.68 wt = (2)42.8 GHz 1 Iden = 100 A/m gm =
W 1.8 0.78 mS, where W is transistor width in microns Vdd = 1.8 V Ld Ibias 5 k 50 Cbig Zin x Lg Rpg M1 Ls Rpd M2 Vout CL=1pF M3 Rps Vin Cbig Figure 1: Narrowband LNA. (a) Design the amplifier to achieve the minimum noise figure given the conditions stated above. State the resulting noise figure (at wo ), Ibias , transistor widths, component values, and gain (at wo ) for the amplifier. For intermediate calcula tions, determine , d , and Zgsw . (b) How does the noise figure change for part (a) if c = 0? (a numerical answer is required here) (c) How does the noise figure change for part (a) if c = j1? (a numerical answer is required here) 2. The following is based on Problem 4 in Chapter 12 of Thomas Lee's book. Here we consider the ideal multiplying mixer shown in Figure 2, whose input RF signal is Asin(wrf t) and whose LO signal is either a squarewave or sinusoidal waveform.
Asin(wrf t) out LO Figure 2: Ideal multiplying mixer. (a) Derive the conversion gain of the mixer under the following conditions: 2 i. A squarewave LO waveform with peaktopeak amplitude of 2B whose fre quency is chosen such that the mixer output occurs at a nonzero IF frequency. ii. A sinewave LO waveform with peaktopeak amplitude of 2B whose fre quency is chosen such that the mixer output occurs at a nonzero IF frequency. iii. A squarewave LO waveform with peaktopeak amplitude of 2B whose fre quency is chosen such that the mixer output occurs at zero IF frequency. iv. A sinewave LO waveform with peaktopeak amplitude of 2B whose fre quency is chosen such that the mixer output occurs at zero IF frequency. (b) Comparing the above cases, is there a difference in conversion gain if the IF output occurs at zero or nonzero frequency? (c) Which type of LO signal achieves a higher conversion gain (assuming the same peaktopeak amplitude)? (d) Given a nonzero IF frequency, compare the relative requirements on a postmixer filter to reject undesired frequency components for squarewave and sinewave LO signals. Present your arguments using pictures of the appropriate Fourier transforms of the relevant signals. 3. This problem is based on Problems 5 and 6 in Chapter 12 of Thomas Lee's book. Here we focus on the doublebalanced mixer shown in Figure 3. It will be assumed that a nonzero IF output frequency is sought in all cases.
RS/2 Cbig LO 2Ain Vin Vout LO CL RL/2 RL/2 0V Vout LO Vdd 0 LO Vdd 0 RS/2 Cbig Figure 3: A doublebalanced passive CMOS mixer. (a) Given that RL is set equal to RS , what is the conversion gain of the mixer? Assume infinitely fast switching, neglect switch resistance, and assume that the postmixer RC filter formed by RL and CL has higher bandwidth than the desired IF output. 3 (b) Repeat part (a) given nonzero switch resistance (denoted as Rsw ). What is the maximum acceptable switch resistance if the degradation in conversion gain (rel ative to part (a)) is not to exceed 1 dB? (c) How does the filter requirement change if the LO drive does not possess a per fect 50 % duty cycle? Express your answer using pictures of the appropriate Fourier transforms where you have considered the impact of the non50% duty cycle square wave. Based on this exercise, how important is the achievement of symmetry in device switching for the mixer? 4. This problem focuses on the analysis and simulation of the Weaver image rejection mixer architecture shown in Figure 4.
LPF
A C RF Input sin(w1t) cos(w1t) sin(w2t) cos(w2t) Baseband Output LPF B D RF input Desired Signal Image fi f1 fd fd f1 fi f Figure 4: The Weaver image rejection mixer architecture. (a) Given the RF signal Fourier transform shown in Figure 4, what condition is required for the signal centered at fi to be the image of the desired signal centered at fd (i.e., what is the relationship between fi , fd , and f1 ?). (b) Given the relationship in part (a), what value should be chosen for f2 so that the overall mixer output is at baseband frequencies (i.e., has an IF frequency of zero)? (c) Given the conditions in part (a) and (b), sketch the Fourier transforms of the signals at nodes A, B, C, D, and the overall output of the mixer. (d) Verify operation of the mixer by simulating the system in Figure 4 using CppSim given f1 = 1 GHz, fd = 900 MHz, the lowpass cutoff frequencies are at 150 MHz, 4 and f2 is appropriately chosen for baseband conversion. Rather than inputing an RF signal as shown in the figure (which would be rather challenging), simply input two sinusoidal signals. One of the signals should be placed at the center of the desired frequency band, and the other should be placed just slightly offset from its respective image frequency location (offset so that you can view it distinctly from the desired location if it were to not be completely rejected in the final output). Note that you'll need to create new CppSim module blocks for the mixers and lowpass filter. Turn in the module code and plots at A, C, and the Output. Hint: Make sure that your input is realvalued. (e) Now modify your CppSim simulation to observe the impact of phase mismatch between the cosine and sine waves at frequency f1 . Specifically, phase shift the sine wave by 1 degree and then measure the corresponding image rejection ratio at DC based on the simulation results. 5 ...
View
Full
Document
 Spring '03
 MICHAELPERROTT
 Electrical Engineering

Click to edit the document details