This preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: ORIE 3310/5310: Prelim 4 Solutions and grading scheme (problems 2, 3) 2(a) Give the cut developed by Gomory for the standard form integer programming problem with A,b,c integervalued: max { cs  Ax = b, x ,x integral } Solution. Consider an optimal basic solution of the LPrelaxation (where the solution is not integer valued). Let x B i be a basic variable in row i of the simplex tableau, with x B i = b i , not an integer. The row i equation has the following form: x B i + X x j nonbasic a ij x j = b i . (1) For all feasible solution x to the LPrelaxation, the following holds: x B i + X x j nonbasic b a ij c x j b i . The following may not be satisfied by all solution x to the LP relaxation, but is satisfied by all integralvalued solution x to the LP relaxation: x B i + X x j nonbasic b a ij c x j b i . (2) By equations (1) and (2), we have: X x j nonbasic ( a ij b a ij c ) x j b i b i . (3) [Total: 10 points. Seven points for correct cut/constraint as given in (3) above; 3 points for some explanation of the cut. If constraint (3) is not explicitly written but is explained well, then partial credit will be given, proportional to how clear the explanation is. An explanation is clear when it can very easily be seen that it describes inequality (3).] 2(b) Show that the slack variable for the cut from part (a) must also be integervalued for any integral, feasible solution to the original problem. Why is this important?...
View Full
Document
 Spring '08
 BLAND

Click to edit the document details