09-21-09-FINAL - criteria It seeks to minimize external...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–7. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Performance  Appraisal Process
Background image of page 2
Performance Appraisal means evaluation  the employees’ performance.  Based on this analysis, firms will  determine if they deserve the job or maybe  a promotion or reward.  One of the most significant and  indispensable tool for any company. Company will be able to achieve the goals  by combining all the information in all the  departments
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
. ALTERNATIO RANKING  METHOD:  Com pa n y  ra n ks  th e  be st  e m ploye e s. GRAPHIC SCALE  METHOD:  Ea ch   e m ploye e  is ra te d in  a   prin te d form . CRITICAL INCIDENT  METHOD:  Ke e p tra ck of  th e  e m ploye e s  a ccom plish  a n d fa ilu re s PAIRED COMPARISON  METHOD: com pa re   qu a litie s a m on g  e m ploye e s APPRAISAL TOOLS
Background image of page 4
Analyze duties of the employees Employees should be aware of  his/her duties Measure the performance of the  employees. Discuss the appraisal with the  employees. Corrective Action
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
It provides more objective appraisal 
Background image of page 6
Background image of page 7
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: criteria It seeks to minimize external controls and maximize internal motivation through joint goal setting between All the department heads, managers and the subordinates are involved thus increasing the control of overall work. Findley, H., Giles, W., & Mossholder, K. (2000, August). Performance appraisal process and system facets: Relationships with contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology , 85 (4), 634-640. Retrieved September 17, 2009, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.634 Rasch, L. (2004, June). EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND THE 95/5 RULE. Community College Journal of Research & Practice , 28 (5), 407-414. Retrieved September 20, 2009, doi:10.1080/10668920490444436 Mondy, R.W. (2010). Human Resource Management . Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson / Prentice Hall....
View Full Document

Page1 / 7

09-21-09-FINAL - criteria It seeks to minimize external...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 7. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online