NRQM10_1

NRQM10_1 - Physics 216 Problem Set 1 Spring 2010 DUE:...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Physics 216 Problem Set 1 Spring 2010 DUE: TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 2010 1. Prove that ( x , t | T [ X ( t 1 ) X ( t 2 ) X ( t n )] | x , t ) = integraldisplay D [ x ( t )] x ( t 1 ) x ( t 2 ) x ( t n ) e iS [ x ( t )] / planckover2pi1 , where T is the time-ordered product symbol, S [ x ( t )] is the action [which depends on the path x ( t )], X ( t ) is the position operator in the Heisenberg picture, and x ( t ) is the eigenvalue of X ( t ) when acting on the position eigenstate | x , t ) . Assume that t t i and t t i for all i = 1 , 2 , . . ., n . 2. Using the path integral technique, compute the propagator for a particle in a linear potential, where the corresponding Lagrangian is given by: L ( x, x ) = 1 2 m x 2 + fx . 3. You are the creator of a wonderful theory that uniquely predicts the quark- antiquark potential to be: V ( r ) = a | vector r | planckover2pi1 c , (1) with a = 0 . 24 GeV 2 . However, before you can claim The Prize, there is a small formality: a comparison between theory and experiment. (a) Using the potential specified in eq. (1), calculate the energy differences, 1 E n E ns E 1 s , for a few lowest lying s-states (...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 10/31/2011.

Page1 / 3

NRQM10_1 - Physics 216 Problem Set 1 Spring 2010 DUE:...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online