© Sanjay K. Chugh
105
Spring 2008
Chapter 8
InfinitePeriod Representative Consumer
and Asset Pricing
Macroeconomic models, at least those based on microfoundations, used in applied
research and in practice assume that there is an infinite number of periods, rather than just
two as we have been for the most part assuming.
A twoperiod model is usually
sufficient for the purpose of illustrating intuition about how consumers make
intertemporal choices, but in order to achieve the higher quantitative precision needed for
many research and policy questions, moving to an infiniteperiod model is desirable.
Here we will sketch the problem faced by an infinitelylived representative consumer,
describing preferences, budget constraints, and the general characterization of the
solution.
In sketching the basic model, we will see that in its natural formulation, it
easily lends itself to a study of assetpricing.
Indeed, this model lies at the intersection of
macroeconomic theory and finance theory and forms the basis of consumptionbased
assetpricing theories.
We will touch on some of these macrofinance linkages, but we
really will only be able to whet our curiosity about more advanced finance theory.
For
the most part, we will index time by arbitrary indexes
1, ,
1
t
t t
±
²
, etc., rather than
“naming” periods as “period 1,” “period 2,” and so on.
That is, we will simply speak of
“period
t
,” “period
t
+1,” “period
t
+2,” etc.
Before we begin, we again point out that “the consumer” we are modeling is a standin
for the economy as a whole.
In that sense, we of course do not literally mean that a
particular individual considers his intertemporal planning horizon to be infinite when
making choices.
But to the extent that “the economy” outlives any given individual, an
infinitelylived representative agent is, as usual, a simple representation.
Preferences
The utility function that is relevant in the infiniteperiod model in principle is a lifetime
utility function just as in our simple twoperiod model.
As before, suppose that time
begins in period one but now never ends.
The lifetime utility function can thus be written
as
1
2
3
4
5
(
,
,
,
,
,...)
v c c
c
c
c
.
This function describes total utility as a function of consumption in every period 1, 2, 3,
… and is the analog of the utility function
1
2
(
,
)
u c c
in our twoperiod model.
The
function
v
above is quite intractable mathematically because it takes an infinite number
of arguments.
Largely for this reason, in practice an
instantaneous utility function
that
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
© Sanjay K. Chugh
106
Spring 2008
describes how utility in a given period depends on consumption in a given period is
typically used.
The easiest formulation to consider is the additively separable function,
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
(
,
,
,
,
,...)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
...
v c c
c
c
c
u c
u c
u c
u c
u c
E
E
E
E
²
²
²
²
²
,
where
(.)
u
is the instantaneous utility function.
As written, period
t
utility depends only
on period
t
consumption.
This is the end of the preview.
Sign up
to
access the rest of the document.
 Spring '08
 chugh
 Economics, Inflation, Sanjay K. Chugh

Click to edit the document details