{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

325_PracticePS6_Soln

# 325_PracticePS6_Soln - Department of Economics University...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

Department of Economics University of Maryland Economics 325 Intermediate Macroeconomic Analysis Practice Problem Set 6 Suggested Solutions Professor Sanjay Chugh Spring 2011 1. Lags in Labor Hiring. Rather than supposing that the representative firm at the beginning of period t can decide how much labor it would like to hire for use in period t, suppose that labor used in period t must be chosen in period t-1. (That is, suppose n is a stock (aka state) variable.) As usual, capital for use in production in period t must be purchased in period t-1 because of the “time to build” surrounding capital goods. With this lag in labor hiring, construct the lifetime (in the two-period model) profit function of the firm, and show that the real interest rate now is a relevant price for labor as well as capital goods. Provide brief economic intuition. ( Hint: Make as close an analogy with our model of firm ownership of capital as you can – in particular, think of workers in this model as being “owned” (contractually obligated to) firms.) Solution: With employees being contractually bound to (“owned by”) firms, the period-t nominal profits of a firm are given by 1 1 ( , ) t t t t t t t t t t t t t t PR P f k n Pk Pw n Pk Pw n ± ± ± ± ² ² , in which labor used in production in period t, t n , is chosen in period t-1 (and thus labor used in production in period t+1, 1 t n ± , is chosen in period t. In analogy with our model with only capital pre-determined, the employees of a firm are a valuable “asset,” with total market value t t t Pw n -- notice that this term enters positively in period t profits, rather than negatively with non-pre-determined labor. What enters negatively in period t profits here is the “purchase” of period t+1 labor, namely the term 1 t t t Pw n ± ² . In the two period model, discounted nominal profits of the firm are therefore 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 ( , ) ( , ) 1 1 1 1 1 i i i i i P f k n P k P w n P k P w n PR P f k n Pk Pw n Pk Pw n i i i i i ± ± ² ² ± ± ± ² ² ± ± ± ± ± The usual zero-terminal-assets condition in this case means that 3 0 k and 3 0 n (the latter, again, because labor should be thought of as an “asset” here). Focusing attention on the choice of 2 n (since 1 n was chosen in period t-1), the first-order condition of the lifetime profit function with respect to 2 n is

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 ( , ) 0 1 1 n P f k n P w Pw i i ² ± ± ± ± . This expression can be rearranged to yield (using the exact Fisher equation) 1 1 2 2 2 (1 ) ( , ) n r w f k n w ± ± . If the real wage were equal to one in each period, this condition would reduce to 1 2 2 ( , ) n r f k n , which would be almost identical to the condition we derived in class regarding capital demand (except of course in that case k f is the relevant marginal product rather than n f ). The expression 1 2 2 ( , ) n r f k n shows that if firms must choose labor for period 2 in period 1, the real interest rate between period 1 and period 2 is a relevant price to consider – which makes sense because there is now an interest opportunity cost associated with hiring labor (ie, “investment” in hiring).
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}