2010-05-26_194814_jury_trial - The process of a jury trial...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The process of a jury trial starts before the judge, jury, prosecution, and defense enter the courtroom. It actually starts with the accused and the law enforcement agency that arrested him. At this point, the accused must be read his constitutional rights, otherwise known as Miranda rights, from the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966). While still a suspect, the police must remind the accused of their right to remain silent, right to an attorney, right to a court appointed attorney if they cannot afford a lawyer. This must occur before interrogation, and a good police force will probably read it to the suspect not once, but several times. Note, however, that if they do not intend to question the suspect, they do not have to read him these rights, and indeed may never do so in some instances. However, if the police have started questioning a suspect, they should stop as soon as the suspect requests a lawyer to represent them. (Larson, 2000) Once placed under arrest and taken into custody, the accused will have pre-trial hearings. The first of these may well be to determine whether or not bond will be allowed to keep the suspect out of jail until the next hearing. In most cases bond is set at the time of actual arrest, however some individuals will have to wait for a bond hearing before a judge, who sets the amount of the bond. In the hearing the Judge will read the actual charges against the suspect, then determine, based on their seriousness, whether or not a bond will even be allowed. The court can refuse Bond money received if they determine it was obtained illegally. The court can also deny bond if they believe the suspect is a flight risk – someone who will pay the bond to get out of jail and then disappear before the next scheduled hearing. (Superpages) The next pre-trial hearing is where judges have the opportunity to hear the evidence collected and to determine whether all of it was acquired legally by law enforcement. following state law and the U.S. Constitution. ”If the person was unlawfully arrested, or the search and/or seizure were illegal, grounds exist for suppression. This means the prosecution may not be able to introduce certain evidence at trial that may have been incriminating. In some cases, where the primary evidence is suppressed, cases must be dismissed.” (Miranda) Examples of this would include police searching a home without a
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/02/2011 for the course POLICING T 333 taught by Professor Crystaldickersonbynum during the Spring '11 term at University of Phoenix.

Page1 / 4

2010-05-26_194814_jury_trial - The process of a jury trial...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online