god - descartes amd aquinas (Autosaved)

god - descartes amd aquinas (Autosaved) - Can Gods...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Can God’s existence be proven with certainty? For this question, you may compare the “proofs” of Descartes and Thomas Aquinas and indicate whether Descartes’ certainty or Aquinas’ doubt seems more plausible. (Philosophy of Religion Issue) Rene Descartes Descartes argument is rational, in the sense that it does not depend upon experience garnered through the sense. He works with the concept of God. The concept of God necessarily contains the idea of His being perfect. Since Descartes says that existence is a perfection it follows that he must exist. On the other hand, Aquinas’s argument for God’s existence operates within the framework of practical reason . He needs to learn that God is exist from some experiences. The comparison is that they both attempt to prove the existence of God, but they differ in respect to how they attempt to prove the concept. The foundationalist Descartes seeks certainty for his belief in God and claims to find such certainty in a proof from the history of ideas. This proof has come to be known as the ontological proof. Descartes tries to support a theistic view with his radical foundationalism. Descartes asked himself whether there was any room for value in a world of scientific fact.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This document was uploaded on 11/03/2011 for the course PHILOSOPHY Pl 201 at Montgomery.

Page1 / 3

god - descartes amd aquinas (Autosaved) - Can Gods...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online