Medical Ethics Darin Harootunian 9/26/11 2 Answer: The CDA is unsound –it’s not deductively valid.Question 2a: Is the Revised Deductive CDA sound or unsound? Answer: Unsound. Premise 1 is false. The antecedent of the conditional can be true and the conclusion false. Step 3: Suppose the CDA is a non-deductive argument. Rachels never considers the CDA to be a non-deductive argument, at least not directly, not explicitly. After showing the CDA to be deductively invalid, he dispatches it. But after doing so, he turns his attention to another task: showing that Cultural Relativism is unlikely to be true. To do this, one thing that he must consider is whether the differences in moral codes across different cultures makes it likely to be the case that Cultural Relativism is true. Of course this is just to treat the CDA as a non-deductive argument. So let’sbegin by formulating the CDA as a non-deductive argument: Step 3a: Formulate the CDA as a non-deductive argument.
This is the end of the preview.
access the rest of the document.