Act%20Utilitarianism%20-%20A%20Closer%20Look%20%28Wilhelm%2c%20Dr.%20Utility%2c%20and%20Trolleys%29-

Act%20Utilitarianism%20-%20A%20Closer%20Look%20%28Wilhelm%2c%20Dr.%20Utility%2c%20and%20Trolleys%29-

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Medical Ethics Darin Harootunian 9/30/11 2 Take C 2 to be Sally’s culture. Cultural Relativism says, John’s claim , “Genocide is morally right,” is equivalent to “Genocide is right-according-to C 1 , which is simply a claim about what C 1 says what’ s in C 1 ’s “ moral book .” Sally ’s claim, “Genocide is morally wrong,” is equivalent to “Genocide is wrong-according-to-C 2 , which is simply a claim about what C 2 says what’ s in C 2 ’s “ moral book .” Here is the problem. We think that if ever there were a moral disagreement, John and Sally are having one right now one is saying genocide is morally right, and the other is saying genocide is morally wrong! But a logical consequence of Cultural Relativism, to the surprise and chagrin of the cultural relativist himself, is that John and Sally a ren’t disagreeing that it’s not even possible for them to disagree ! A disagreement is this: One person says p , another says not p . John’s claim and Sally’s claim don’t amount to p and not p . Rather, John is saying
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
Ask a homework question - tutors are online