Act%20Utilitarianism%20-%20A%20Closer%20Look%20%28Wilhelm%2c%20Dr.%20Utility%2c%20and%20Trolleys%29-

Act%20Utilitarianism%20-%20A%20Closer%20Look%20%28Wilhelm%2c%20Dr.%20Utility%2c%20and%20Trolleys%29-

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Medical Ethics Darin Harootunian 9/30/11 3 problem can be developed into an objection against Cultural Relativism. But I won’t develop the objection further. I’ll let you think about it, in case someone wants to write an essay on it. Now I want to offer some suggestions on how to improve each of the three arguments that Rachels presents. We need to avoid formulating the arguments by using a premise that is justified by a considered moral judgment. This can be done fairly easily. Since Cultural Relativism is a linguistic theory of moral language, our arguments against it will be linguistic arguments. The Argument of Inter Cultural Criticism (Improved) 1) If Cultural Relativism is true, then a speaker ’s moral criticism of another culture amounts to nothing more than the speaker saying that his culture’s moral standard is not the other culture’s moral standard. 2) It’s not the case that a speaker’s moral criticism of another culture amounts to nothing more than the speaker saying t
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/07/2011 for the course PHIL 164 taught by Professor Doviak during the Fall '07 term at UMass (Amherst).

Ask a homework question - tutors are online