Act%20Utilitarianism%20-%20A%20Closer%20Look%20%28Wilhelm%2c%20Dr.%20Utility%2c%20and%20Trolleys%29-

Act%20Utilitarianism%20-%20A%20Closer%20Look%20%28Wilhelm%2c%20Dr.%20Utility%2c%20and%20Trolleys%29-

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Medical Ethics Darin Harootunian 9/12/11 1 Deductive and Non-Deductive Arguments Arguments can be divided into deductive arguments and non-deductive arguments. The premises of a deductive argument are intended by the author to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. The premises of a non-deductive argument are not intended by the author to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. With an inductive argument, the author intends to offer premises (reasons) for a conclusion such that if the premises are true, the conclusion is likely to be true, not guaranteed to be true. Consider the following arguments: 1) All pretzels are radioactive objects. 2) All radioactive objects are good for whitening your teeth. Thus, 3) all pretzels are good for whitening your teeth. 1) The patient has been weak and febrile for 3 days with a temperature ranging between 100 and 102 degrees F. 2) The patient’s cough and conjunctivitis has persisted for 5 days. 3) The patient has maculopapular erythemas on his chest and back and all four extremities.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/07/2011 for the course PHIL 164 taught by Professor Doviak during the Fall '07 term at UMass (Amherst).

Ask a homework question - tutors are online