Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 102, NO. D24, PAGES 28,731-28,769, DECEMBER 26, 1997 BOREAS in 1997: Experiment overview, scientific results, and future directions Piers J. Sellers, • Forrest G. Hall, • Robert D. Kelly, 2 Andrew Black, 3 Dennis Baldocchi, 4 Joe Berry, s Michael Ryan, 6 K. Jon Ranson, • Patrick M. Crill, 7 Dennis P. Lettenmaier, s Hank Margolis, 9 Josef Cihlar, •ø Jeffrey Newcomer, • David Fitzjarrald, TM Paul G. Jarvis, •2 Stith T. Gower, •3 David Halliwell, TM Darrel Williams, • Barry Goodison, •s Diane E. Wickland, •6 and Florian E. Guertin •ø Abstract. The goal of the Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) is to improve our understanding of the interactions between the boreal forest biome and the atmosphere in order to clarify their roles in global change. This overview paper describes the science background and motivations for BOREAS and the experimental design and operations of the BOREAS 1994 and BOREAS 1996 field years. The findings of the 83 papers in this journal special issue are reviewed. In section 7, important scientific results of the project to date are summarized and future research directions are identified. 1. Introduction Persuasive arguments indicate that there will be global warming resulting from the continuing increase in atmospheric CO 2 concentration [Houghton et al., 1995; Hasselmann, 1997]. However, there are uncertainties about the magnitude and regional patterns of projected global change because of short- comings in the atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) used for climate simulation. There is a real need to improve (1) our understanding of basic climatic physical and dynamic processes so that we can enhance the realism and accuracy of AGCMs and (2) our ability to quantify global-scale climate variables and parameters to better initialize and vali- date models. Success in these two research areas should result in improved climate models and data sets, which in turn should provide more credible and useful climate projections [Tren- berth, 1992; Sellers et al., 1997]. The exchanges of energy, water, and carbon between the atmosphere and the continents represent the lower boundary condition for the atmospheric physical climate system and the climatic forcing to terrestrial biota and biogeochemical cycles. •NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland. 2University of Wyoming, Laramie. 3University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 4National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. SCarnegie Institution, Stanford, California. "United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, Colorado. 7University of New Hampshire, Durham....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/07/2011 for the course EAS 8803 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at Georgia Tech.

Page1 / 39


This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online