This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: 6.012  Microelectronic Devices and Circuits Lecture 13  Linear Equivalent Circuits  Outline
• Announcements
Exam Two  Coming next week, Nov. 5, 7:309:30 p.m. • Review  Subthreshold operation of MOSFETs
• Review  Large signal models, w. charge stores
pn diode, BJT, MOSFET (subthreshold and strong inversion) • Small signal models; linear equivalent circuits
General two, three, and four terminal devices
pn diodes: Linearizing the exponential diode Adding linearized charge stores BJTs: Linearizing the F.A.R. βmodel Adding linearized charge stores MOSFETs: Linearized strong inversion model Linearized subthreshold model Adding linearized charge stores Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 1 Subthreshold Operation of MOSFETs, cont.  The barrier at the n+p junction is lowered near the oxideSi
interface for any vGS > VFB.
 The barrier is lowered by φ(x)  φp for 0 < x < xD.
(This is the effective vBE on the lateral BJT between x and x + dx.) tox S VFB < vGS < VT G 0 vDS > 0 φ(0,y)
D φn++ vDS Injection xD n+ φ p
φ(x) n+ p tn+
x Plot vs y
at ﬁxed x,
0 < x < xD. vBS = 0
0 φ(x) B
L y  The barrier lowering
vGS
(effective forward bias)
(1) is controlled by vGS,
and (2) decreases
quickly with x.
vBE,eff(x)
= [φ(x)− φp]
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09  φp
φm
tox φn+
y φ(x)φp L 0 φp
Plot vs x
at ﬁxed y,
0 < y < L. φ(0) x xd φp
Injection occurs over this range,
but is largest near x = 0. Lecture 13  Slide 2 Subthreshold Operation of MOSFETs, cont.  To calculate iD, we first find the current in each dx thick slab:
G VFB < vGS < VT S vDS > 0 D tox
0 x
x+dx n+ n+ p xD
vBS = 0
y x 0 n ' ( x, 0) = n i (e q" ( x ,vGS ) / kT # 1) $ n ie q" ( x ,vGS ) / kT diD ( x ) = q De
Clif
! Fonstad, 10/27/09 L n ' ( x, L) " n ' ( x, 0) e# qv DS / kT n ' ( x, 0) " n ' ( x, L)
W
W dx #
De q n i (1 " e" qv DS / kT ) ) e q$ ( x,vGS ) / kT dx
L
L ! Lecture 13  Slide 3 Subthreshold Operation of MOSFETs, cont.  Integrating this from x = 0 to x = xD using the approximate value
for the integral derived in Lecture 9, and approximating the
relationship between Δφ(0) and ΔvGS as linear, i.e. Δφ(0) ≈ ΔvGS/n,
we arrived at:
2 $ kT '
W
*
iD, s"t ( vGS ,vDS ,0) #
µ e Cox & ) [n " 1] e q{ vGS "VT } n kT (1 " e "qvDS / kT )
L
%q( &
*
(
1
#SiqN A (
n " '1 + *
+ =( Cox 2[$2% p ] (
)
,
Variations on this form: It is common to see iD,st written using the factors K and γ we defined earlier, and with kT/q replaced by Vt, the thermal voltage, and [n 1] !
replaced in the prefactor. Written this way, we have: where ! iD ,s" t (vGS , v DS , 0) # K Vt
with $ 2 2 ["2% ] e{ vGS "VT } nVt (1 " e " v DS / Vt ) p (
*
2$SiqN A
W
*
"#
, K # µe Cox , n (v BS ) % )1 +
*
Cox
L
*2
+
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09
! ,
*
[&2' p & v BS ] * Lecture 13
. "  Slide 4 Subthreshold Output Characteristic
 We plot a family of iD vs vDS curves with (vGS  VT) as the family
variable, after first defining the subthreshold diode saturation
current, IS,st:
$
IS ,s" t # K Vt2
= K Vt2 [ n " 1]
2 ["2% p ]
log iD,st
101 IS,st ! (vGSVT) = 0.12xn Volts 102 IS,st
103
104 (vGSVT) = 0.06xn Volts (vGSVT) = 0.18xn Volts IS,st (vGSVT) = 0.24xn Volts IS,st vDS iD ,s" t (vGS , v DS , 0) # IS ,s" t e{
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 vGS "VT } n Vt (1 " e " v DS / Vt )
Lecture 13  Slide 5 Large Signal Model for MOSFET Operating Subthreshold  The large signal model for a MOSFET operating in the weak
inversion or subthreshold region looks the same model as that
for a device operating in strong inversion (vGS > VT) EXCEPT
there is a different equation relating iD to vGS, vDS, and vBS:
We will limit our model to D vGS " VT , v DS > 3Vt and v BS = 0. iD ! iD (vGS , vDS ) G
iG (= 0) iG ,s" t (vGS , v DS , v BS ) = 0 S,B
iD ,s" t (vGS , v DS , 0) # IS ,s" t ! " $v DS ) e{
(1 Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 ! Early effect vGS "VTo } n Vt (1 " e " v DS / Vt ) ≈ 1 for vDS > 3 Vt
Lecture 13  Slide 6 Large signal models with charge stores: A pn diode: qAB IBS qAB: Excess carriers on pside plus
excess carriers on nside plus
junction depletion charge. B qBC C BJT: npn
(in F.A.R.) iB’
B MOSFET:
nchannel qBE: Excess carriers in base plus
EB junction depletion charge
qBC: CB junction depletion charge IBS
E qBE
D qDB qG
iD G
S
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 !FiB’ qG: Gate charge; a function of vGS, B vDS, and vBS.
qDB: DB junction depletion charge
qSB: SB junction depletion charge qSB
Lecture 13  Slide 7 Signal notation: A transistor circuit, whether digital or analog, is typically
connected to several DC power supplies that establish the
desired DC "bias" currents and voltages throughout it. It also
typically has one or more time varying input signals that
result in time varying currents and voltages (one of which is
the desired output of the circuit) being added to the DC bias
currents and voltages.
Each voltage and current in such a circuit thus has a DC bias
portion and a signal portion, which add to make the total. We
use the following notation to identify these components and
the total: iA ( t ) = IA + ia ( t )
v AB ( t ) = VAB + v ab ( t ) Total: lowercase
letter and uppercase subscript. !
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Signal: lowercase
Bias: uppercase letter and subscript. letter and subscript. Lecture 13  Slide 8 DC Bias Values:
To construct linear amplifiers and other linear signal processing circuits from nonlinear electronic devices we must use
regions in the nonlinear characteristics that are locally linear
over useful current and voltage ranges, and operate there.
To accomplish this we must design the circuit so that the DC
voltages and currents throughout it "bias" all the devices in
the circuit into their desired regions, e.g. yield the proper
bias currents and voltages: IA , IB , IC , ID , etc. and VAG , VBG , VCG , VDG , etc. This design is done with the signal inputs set to zero and using
the large signal static device models we have developed for
!the nonlinear devices we studied: diodes, BJTs, MOSFETs.
Working with these models to get the bias values, though not
onerous, can be tedious. It is not something we want to have
to do to find voltages and currents when the signal inputs are
applied. Instead we use linear equivalent circuits .
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 9 Linear equivalent circuits: After biasing each nonlinear devices at the proper point the
signal currents and voltages throughout the circuit will be
linearly related for small enough input signals. To calculate
how they are related, we make use of the linear equivalent
circuit (LEC) of our circuit.
The LEC of any circuit is a combination of linear circuit
elements (resistors, capacitors, inductors, and dependent
sources) that correctly models and predicts the firstorder
changes in the currents and voltages throughout the circuit
when the input signals change.
A circuit model that represents the proper first order linear
relationships between the signal currents and voltages in a
nonlinear device is call an LEC for that device.
Our next objective is to develop LECs for each of the nonlinear devices we have studied: diodes, BJTs biased in
their forward active region (FAR), and MOSFETs biased in
their subthreshold and strong inversion FARs.
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 10 Creating a linear equivalent circuit, LEC: Consider a device with three terminals, X, Y, and Z: qX(vXZ , vXY) qY(vYZ, vYX) X Y iX(vXZ , vYZ) iY(vXZ , vYZ)
Z Suppose, as is our situation with the large signal device models
we have developed in 6.012, that we have expressions for the
currents into terminals X and Y in terms of the voltages vXZ
and vYZ:
iX (v XZ , vYZ ) and iY (v XZ , vYZ )
and that we similarly have expressions for the charge stores
associated with terminals X and Y:
!
qX (v XZ , vYZ ) and qY (v XZ , vYZ )
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 11 ! Creating an LEC, cont.: We begin with our static model expressions for the terminal
characteristics, and write a Taylor's series expansion of
them about a bias point, Q, defined as a specific set of vXZ
and vYZ that we write, using our notation, as VXZ and VYZ
For example, for the current into terminal X we have:
"iX
"iX
1 " 2iX
iX (v XZ , vYZ ) = iX (VXZ ,VYZ ) +
(v XZ # VXZ ) +
(vYZ # VYZ ) +
(v XZ # VXZ ) 2
2
"v XZ Q
"vYZ Q
2 "v XZ Q
1 " 2iX
1 " 2iX
2
+
(vYZ # VYZ ) +
(v XZ # VXZ )(vYZ # VYZ ) + even higher order terms
2
2 "vYZ Q
2 "v XZ "vYZ Q For sufficiently small* (vXZVXZ) and (vYZVYZ), the second
and higher order terms are negligible, and we have:
iX (v XZ , vYZ ) " iX (VXZ ,VYZ ) + iX (VXZ ,VYZ ) = IX (VXZ ,VYZ ) #iX
#i
(v XZ $ VXZ ) + X (vYZ $ VYZ )
#v XZ Q
#vYZ Q [v XZ " VXZ ] # v xz [vYZ " VYZ ] # v yz Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09
Lecture 13  Slide 12
* What is "sufficiently small" is determined by the magnitude of the higher order derivatives.
! ! ! Creating an LEC, cont.: So far we have: i (v , v ) " I (V ,V ) # $iX v + $iX v
X
XZ
YZ
X
XZ
YZ
xz
yz
$v XZ Q
$vYZ Q
Next we define: [iX " IX ] # ix "iX
"v XZ ! # gi
Q "iX
"vYZ # gr
Q Replacing the partial derivatives with the conductances we have
defined, gives us our working form of the linear equation relating
!
the incremental variables: !
ix " giv xz + grv yz Doing the same for iY, we arrive at
$iY
$i
go # Y
$v XZ Q
$vYZ Q
A circuit matching these relationships is seen below:
i
iy
xx
y
+
!
v xz gi
go v yz
gr v yz
gfv xz
z
z Lecture 13
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09
iy " g f v xz + g! yz
ov where g f #
where  Slide 13 Creating an LEC, cont.: This linear equivalent circuit is only good at low frequencies:
x ix
+ v xz
z iy
gi gr v yz y go v yz gfv xz z To handle high frequency signals, we linearize the charge
stores' dependencies on voltage also.
qX(vXZ , vXY) qY(vYZ, vYX) X Y iX(vXZ , vYZ) iY(vXZ , vYZ)
Z Their LECs are linear capacitors: "qX
"v XZ
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 # Cxz
Q "qY
"vYZ # Cyz
Q "qX
"v XY # Cxy
Q $ "q
&= Y
& "v
YX
% '
)
)
Q( Lecture 13  Slide 14 Creating an LEC, cont.:
Adding these to the model yields: ix
x
+
v xz gi
z iy Cxy
Cxz
gr v yz Cyz gfv xz go y v yz
z Two important points: #1  All of the elements in this LEC depend on the bias point, Q: gi = "iX
"i
"i
"i
"q
"q
"q
, gr = X , g f = Y , go = Y , Cxz = X , Cxy = X , Cyz = Y
"v XZ Q
"vYZ Q
"v XZ Q
"vYZ Q
"v XZ Q
"v XY Q
"vYZ #2  The devicespecific nature of an LEC is manifested in the
dependences of the element values on the bias currents
and voltages, rather than in the topology of the LEC. Thus,
different devices may have LECs that look the same. (For
example, the BJ and FET LECs may look similar, but some of the
elements depend much differently on the bias point values.)
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 15 Q Linear equivalent circuit (LEC) for pn diodes (low f): We begin with the static model for the terminal
characteristics:
qv
kT
iD (v AB ) = IS [e AB A " 1] + iD vAB IIBS
S Linearizing iD about VAB, which we will
denote by Q (for quiescent bias point):
!
#i
iD (v AB ) " iD (VAB ) + D [v AB $ VAB ]
#v AB Q – B We define the equivalent incremental conductance of the
diode, gd,
#i
q
q ID
a+
gd " D =
IS e qV / kT $
!
#v AB Q kT
kT
id
AB and we use our notation to write:
! ID = iD (VAB ), id = [iD " ID ], ending up with ! gd v ab = [v AB " VAB ] id = gd v ab b vab
– q ID
gd "
kT The corresponding LEC is shown at right: Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 16 ! ! LEC for pn diodes (high f): At high frequencies we must include the charge store, qAB, and linearize its two components*: qAB = qDP + qQNR , p " side A
qAB IBS Depletion layer charge store, qDP, and its
linear equivalent capacitance, Cdp:
!
qDP (v AB ) = " AqN Ap x p (v AB ) # " A 2q$Si N Ap (% b " v AB ) 'qDP
Cdp (VAB ) &
'v AB ! Q Cdf (VAB ) " ! q$Si N Ap
=A
2 (% b " VAB ) a Diffusion charge store, qQNR,pside, and its linear
equivalent capacitance, Cdf:
qQNR , p " side (v AB ) = ! B Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 iD [ w p " x p ]
2 De #qQNR , p $ side
#v AB gd 2 b q ID [ w p $ x p ]
= gd % d
kT
2 De
2 =
Q Cd with % d " * This discusion assumes an n+p diode) [w p $ xp] 2 2 De
Lecture 13  Slide 17 Linear equivalent circuit for BJTs in FAR (low f): In the forward active region, our static model says:
iB (v BE , vCE ) = IBS [e qv BE kT " 1] iC (v BE , vCE ) = # o [1 + $vCE ] iB (v BE , vCE ) = # o IBS [e qv BE kT " 1][1 + $vCE ] We begin by linearizing iC about Q:
"iC
"i
ic (v be , v ce ) =
v be + C v ce = gm v be + gov ce
!
"v BE Q
"vCE Q
We introduced the transconductance, gm, and the output
conductance, go, defined as:
#i
#i
!
gm " C
go " C
#v BE Q
#vCE Q
Evaluating these partial derivatives using our expression for iC,
we find:
q
qI
gm =
" o IBS e qV kT [1 + #VCE ] $ C
BE ! kT go = " o IBS [e qVBE
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 kT + 1] # $ # IC kT
%
IC (
' or $
*
VA )
& Lecture 13  Slide 18 LEC for BJTs (low f), cont.: Turning next to iB, we note it only depends on vBE so we have:
"iB
ib (v be ) =
v be = g# v be
"v BE Q
The input conductance, gπ, is defined as:
$i
g" # B
$v BE Q
! (Notice that we do not
define gπ as qIB/kT) To evaluate gπ we do not use our expression for iB, but instead use iB = iC/βo:
$i
1 $iC
g
q IC
g" # B =
= m=
! $v
% o $v BE Q % o
kT % o
BE Q
Representing this as a circuit we have: ib ! Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 b
+
v be g!
e ic
+
v!
 gmv ! (Notice that vbe is also called vπ) go c
+
v ce
e
Lecture 13  Slide 19 LEC for BJTs (high f): qBC To extend the model to high frequency we
linearize the charge stores associated
with the junctions and add them.
The basecollector junction is reverse
biased so the charge associated with it,
qBC, is the depletion region charge. The
corresponding capacitance is labeled Cµ.
qBC (v BC ) " # A 2q$Si [% b ,BC # v BC ] N DC ! Cµ (VBC ) " C
!FiB’ iB’
B IBS
qBE #qBC
#v BC =A
Q E
q$Si N DC
2[% b & VBC ] The baseemitter junction is forward biased and its dominant
charge store is the excess charge injected into the base; the
baseemitter depletion charge store less important.
!
2
wB, eff
De
qVBE / kT
qBE ( vBE ) " Aqn
# 1] "
iC ( vBE )
[e
N AB wB, eff
2 De
2
i The linear equivalent capacitance is labeled Cπ. Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 ! Lecture 13  Slide 20 LEC for BJTs (high f), cont: Cπ can be written in terms of gm and τb:
$q
C" (VBE ) # BE
$v BE Q 2
w B ,eff qIC
%
= gm & b
2 De kT "b 2
w B ,eff
#
2 De Adding Cπ and Cµ to our BJT low frequency LEC we get the full BJT LEC:
!
! ib b
+
v be g!
e +
v!
 c
+
v ce
e q IC
kT
g
g" = m
#F gmv ! go Cµ = A C! gm = go = $ IC ic Cµ q"Si N DC
2[# b $ VBC ] C% = gm & b (= IC VA ) Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 21 ! LEC for MOSFETs in saturation (low f): In saturation, our static model is:
(Recall that α ≈ 1)
iG (vGS , v DS , v BS ) = 0
iB (vGS , v DS , v BS ) " 0
2
K
iD (vGS , v DS , v BS ) =
[vGS $ VT (v BS )] [1 + %(v DS $ VDS,sat )]
2#
W
*
with K & µe Cox and VT = VTo + ' 2( p $ Si $ v BS $ 2( p $ Si
L ( ! ) Note that because iG and iB are zero they are already linear, and we can focus on iD. Linearizing iD about Q we have: "iD
"iD
"iD
id (v gs, v ds, v bs ) =
v gs +
v ds +
v bs
"vGS Q
"v DS Q
"v BS Q = gm v gs + gov ds + gmb v bs
We have introduced the transconductance, gm, output
conductance, go, and substrate transconductance, gmb:
#iD
#iD
#iD
!
gm "
go "
gmb "
#vGS Q
#v DS Q
#v BS Q
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 22 LEC for MOSFETs in saturation (low f), cont.:
A circuit containing all these elements, i.e. the actual LEC, is:
ig
id
g
d
+
+
v gs
v
gmv gs
gmb v bs
go ds
s
s v bs
+ ib
b
Evaluating the conductances in saturation we find:
gm "
go " #iD
#vGS
#iD
#v DS gmb "
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 = K
[VGS % VT (VBS )] [1 + &VDS ] '
$ = K
2
VGS % VT (VBS )] & ' & ID
[
2$ Q Q #iD
#v BS =%
Q 2 K ID $ K
#V
[VGS % VT (VBS )] [1 + &VDS ] T
$
#v BS = ( gm
Q Lecture 13  Slide 23 LEC for MOSFETs in saturation (high f): D For the high frequency model we qDB
linearize and add the charge qG
stores associated with each pair iD
of terminals. G
B
Two, qSB and qDB, are depletion region charge stores associated qSB
S
with the n+ regions of the source and drain. They are relatively straightforward compared to qG., as we will see below. qSB
and qDB contribute two capacitors, Csb and Cdb, to our LEC.
The gate charge, qG, depends in general on vGS, vDS, and vGB
(= vGSvBS), but in saturation, qG only depends on vGS and
vGB (i.e. vGS and vBS) in our model, adding Cgs and Cgb.
When vGS ≥ VT the drain is ideally decoupled from the gate ,
but in any real device there is fringing capacitance between
the gate electrode and the drain diffusion that we must
include as Cgd, a parasitic element.
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 24 LEC for MOSFETs in saturation (high f), cont.: Adding all these capacitors to our LEC yields: ig
g
+
v gs
sv bs
+ ib
b id Cgd
gmv gs Cgs Csb Cgb gmb v bs d
+
v ds
go
s Cdb We find the following results:
#q
2
*
*
*
Cgd = W Cgd , where Cgd is the GD fringing and overlap
Cgs " G = W L Cox
#vGS Q 3 capacitance per unit gate length (parasitic) Csb , Cgb , Cdb : depletion capacitances !
! ! gm " 2 K ID # Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 ! go " $ ID ! gmb = % gm , where % = & 2 2' p ( VBS
Lecture 13  Slide 25 LEC for MOSFETs in saturation when vbs = 0:
A very common situation in many circuits is that there is
no signal applied between on the base, i.e. vbs = 0 (even
though it may be biased relative to the source, VBS ≠ 0 ).
In this case the MOSFET LEC simplifies significantly: ig
g
+
v gs
s,b  id Cgd
gmv gs Cgs go d
+
v ds
Cdb
 s,b The elements that remain retain their original dependences:
gm " #qG
#vGS 2 K ID # go " $ ID 2
*
= W L Cox
3 *
*
Cgd = W Cgd , where Cgd is the GD fringing and overlap
Q
capacitance per unit gate length (parasitic)
!
Cdb : depletion capacitance Cgs " Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 !
! ! Lecture 13  Slide 26 ! LEC for Subthreshold MOSFETs, vBS = 0:
Our large signal model for MOSFETs operated in the subthreshold FAR (vDS >> kT/q) and vBS = 0, is: D iD
iD (vGS , vDS ) G
iG (= 0) iG ,s" t (vGS , v DS , v BS ) = 0
iD ,s" t (vGS , v DS ) # IS ,s" t (1 " $v DS ) e{ GS
v S,B "VTo } n Vt ! Like a MOSFET in saturation with vbs = 0, the LEC has only
!
two elements, gm and go, but now gm is quite different:
#i
q
qI
gm " D =
IS ,s$ t (1 $ %VDS )e q (V $V ) nkT = D
#vGS Q nkT
nkT
GS #i
go " D
#v DS
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 ! = % IS ,s$ t e
Q q (VGS $Vto ) nkT & % ID to '
ID *
)or &
,
VA +
(
Lecture 13  Slide 27 LEC for Subthreshold MOSFETs, vBS = 0, cont.: The LEC for MOSFETs in subthreshold FAR (vDS >> kT/q)
and vBS = 0, is: ig
g
+
v gs
s,b  id gmv gs
gm = q ID
nkT go d
+
v ds
 s,b go " # ID D
The charge store qDB is the same
as qDB in a MOSFETs operated
!
in strong inversion, but gG is
not. gG is the gate capacitance
in depletion (VFB < vGB < VT), so it
is smaller in subthreshold. qDB qG
iD G
S,B Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 28 LEC for Subthreshold MOSFETs, vBS = 0, cont.:
Adding the linear capacitors corresponding to the charge
stores we have: ig
g
+
v gs
s,b #q
Cgs " G
#vGS gmv gs Cgs =W L C
Q id Cgd $
ox go $
2Cox2 (VGS % VFB )
1+
&SiqN A d
+
v ds
Cdb
s,b
* See Lecture 9, Slides 7
and 8, for qG and the
derivation of Cgs. *
*
Cgd = W Cgd , where Cgd is the GD fringing and overlap !
! ! Cdb : depletion capacitance gm = q ID
nkT go " # ID Notice that as before, Cgd is zero in our ideal model. It a
parasitic that cannot be avoided and must be included
because it limits device ! circuit performance.
and
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 29 Comparing the low frequency LECs:
All of our circuit design will be done for operation at "low"
frequencies, that is where the charge store capacitances
play a negligible role. Thus it is interesting to compare
our three transistor LECs when this is true. They all have
the same topology, but differ importantly in gi and gm: in iin
+
v in gi
common
Bias dependences:
gi :
gm :
go :
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 ! iout gmv in BJT out
+
go v out
common ST MOS SI MOS q IC " F kT
0
q IC kT
q ID n kT
$ IC
$ ID 0
2K ID #
$ ID * We will say more about the significance of these
differences when we study amplifier design. ST = subthreshold
SI = strong inversion
Lecture 13  Slide 30 The importance of the bias current:
A very important observation is that all of the elements in
the three LECs we compared depend on the bias level of
the output current, IC, in the case of a BJT, or ID, in the
case of a MOSFET:
Bias dependences:
gi :
gm :
go : BJT ST MOS SI MOS q IC " F kT
0
q IC kT
q ID n kT
$ IC
$ ID 0
2K ID #
$ ID
ST = subthreshold
SI = strong inversion The bias circuitry is a key part of any linear amplifier. The
!
designer must establish a stable bias point for all the
transistors in the amplifier to insure that the gain remains
constant and stable.
We will study amplifier design and practice beginning with
Lecture 17.
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 31 6.012  Microelectronic Devices and Circuits Lecture 13  Linear Equivalent Circuits  Summary • Reminder
Exam Two  In ~ 1 wk., Thursday, Nov. 5, 7:309:30 p.m.
SubThreshold Refs  Lecture 12 slides; Subthreshold writeup • Notation
Total = Bias + Signal iA ( t ) = IA + ia ( t )
v AB ( t ) = VAB + v ab ( t ) Large signal model  Design and analysis of bias conditions Linear equivalent circuits  Signal portion design/analysis !
• Small signal models; linear equivalent circuits Everything depends on the bias point  The value of each
element in an LEC depends on the bias point (often the bias
current). Concentrate for now on low frequency LECs  Full spectrum
LECs with capacitors will only be used to find the upper bound
on the low frequency range of operation. We won't see them
again until Lecture 23.
Clif Fonstad, 10/27/09 Lecture 13  Slide 32 MIT OpenCourseWare
http://ocw.mit.edu 6.012 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits
Fall 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. ...
View Full
Document
 Fall '09
 CharlesG.Sodini

Click to edit the document details