lec10 - MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 16.323...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–6. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 16.323 Principles of Optimal Control Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms . 16.323 Lecture 10 Singular Arcs Bryson Chapter 8 Kirk Section 5.6 Spr 2008 16.323 101 Singular Problems There are occasions when the PMP u ( t ) = arg min H ( x , u , p ,t ) u ( t ) U fails to define u ( t ) can an extremal control still exist? Typically occurs when the Hamiltonian is linear in the control, and the coecient of the control term equals zero . Example: on page 9-10 we wrote the control law: u m b < p 2 ( t ) u ( t ) = b < p 2 ( t ) < b u m p 2 ( t ) < b but we do not know what happens if p 2 = b for an interval of time. Called a singular arc . Bottom line is that the straightforward solution approach does not work, and we need to investigate the PMP conditions in more detail. Key point : depending on the system and the cost, singular arcs might exist, and we must determine their existence to fully characterize the set of possible control solutions. Note: control on the singular arc is determined by the requirements that the coecient of the linear control terms in H u remain zero on the singular arc and so must the time derivatives of H u . Necessary condition for scalar u can be stated as d 2 k ( 1) k u dt 2 k H u k = 0 , 1 , 2 ... June 18, 2008 Spr 2008 Singular Arc Example 1 16.323 102 With x = u , x (0) = 1 and u ( t ) 4 , consider objective 2 min ( x ( t ) t 2 ) 2 dt First form standard Hamiltonian H = ( x ( t ) t 2 ) 2 + p ( t ) u ( t ) which gives H u = p ( t ) and p ( t ) = H x = 2( x t 2 ) , with p (2) = (10.15) Note that if p ( t ) > , then PMP indicates that we should take the minimum possible value of u ( t ) = 0 . Similarly, if p ( t ) < , we should take u ( t ) = 4 . Question: can we get that H u for some interval of time? Note: H u implies p ( t ) , which means p ( t ) , and thus p ( t ) x ( t ) = t 2 , u ( t ) = x = 2 t Thus we get the control law that p ( t ) > u ( t ) = 2 t when p ( t ) = 0 4 p ( t ) < June 18, 2008 Spr 2008 16.323 103 Can show by contradiction that optimal solution has x ( t ) t 2 for...
View Full Document

Page1 / 16

lec10 - MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 16.323...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 6. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online