MIT18_102s09_lec05

MIT18_102s09_lec05 - MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.102 Introduction to Functional Analysis Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms . 22 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009 Lecture 5. Thursday, 19 Feb I may not get quite this far, since I do not want to rush unduly! Let me denote by L 1 ( R ) the space of Lebesgue integrable functions on the line – as defined last time. Proposition 4. L 1 ( R ) is a linear space. Proof. The space of all functions on R is linear, so we just need to check that L 1 ( R ) is closed under multiplication by constants and addition. The former is easy enough – multiplication by gives the zero function which is integrable. If g ∈ L 1 ( R ) then by definition there is an absolutely summable series of step function with elements f n such that (5.1) | f n | < ∞ , f ( x ) = f n ( x ) ∀ x s.t. | f n ( x ) | < ∞ . n n n Then if c = 0 , cf n ‘works’ for cg. The sum of two functions g and g ∈ L 1 ( R ) is a little trickier. The ‘obvious’ thing to do is to take the sum of the series of step functions. This will lead to trouble! Instead, suppose that f n and f n are series of step functions showing that g, g ∈ L 1 ( R ) . Then consider (5.2) h n ( x ) = f k n = 2 k − 1 f k n = 2 k. This is absolutely summable since (5.3) | h n | = | f k | + | f k | < ∞ . n k k More significantly, the series | h n ( x ) | converges if and only if both the series n | f k ( x ) | and the series | f k ( x ) converge. Then, because absolutely convergent k k series can be rearranged, it follows that (5.4) | h n ( x ) | < ∞ = ⇒ h n ( x ) = f k ( x ) + f k ( x ) = g ( x ) + g ( x ) . n n k k Thus, g + g ∈ L 1 ( R ) . So, the message here is to be a bit careful about the selection of the ‘approxi- mating’ absolutely summable series. Here is another example....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/08/2011 for the course PHY 18.102 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '09 term at MIT.

Page1 / 6

MIT18_102s09_lec05 - MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online