This preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: October 27, 2004 Queueing Systems: Lecture 5 Amedeo R. Odoni Lecture Outline • Bounds for G/G/1 systems • A fundamental result for queueing networks • State transition diagrams for Markovian queueing systems and networks: examples • Analysis of dynamic systems • Qualitative behavior of dynamic systems Reference: Sections 4.8.3, 4.10, 4.11 + material in handout A general upper bound for G/G/1 systems • • (1) X S • ) 1 ( ) 1 ( 2 ) ( 2 2 < − ⋅ + ⋅ ≤ ρ ρ σ S X q W A number of bounds are available for very general queueing systems (see Section 4.8) A good example is an upper bound for the waiting time at G/G/1 systems: where and are, respectively, the r.v.’s denoting inter arrival times and service times Under some fairly general conditions, such bounds can be tightened and perform extremely well σ λ Better bounds for a (not so) special case • t , λ 1 ]  [ 0 ≤ > − t X ) 1 ( ) 1 ( 2 ) ( 2 1 2 2 < − ⋅ + ⋅ ≤ + − ρ ρ σ λ ρ S X q B W B ( ) • at most, 1/ λ ρ increases! (2) For G/G/1 systems whose interarrival times have the property that for all nonnegative values of t X E it has been shown that: = ≤ σ λ what does this mean, intuitively? Note that the upper and lower bounds in (1) differ by, and that the percent difference between the upper and lower bounds decreases as A result which is important in analyses of queuing networks Let the arrival process at a M/M/m queuing parameter λ ....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 11/08/2011 for the course AERO 16.72 taught by Professor Hansman during the Fall '06 term at MIT.
 Fall '06
 hansman

Click to edit the document details