projcanderson

# projcanderson - Darrell Cain Zack Anderson Below is an...

This preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

Darrell Cain, Zack Anderson Below is an analysis of the parameter to be maximized along with the constraints on the system. Based on these equations and the fixed parameters it is possible to calculate the range of efficiencies of the overall rectenna panel based upon the efficiency of the climber. This gives the mathematical foundation to build a Matlab simulation which would calculate the range of efficiencies the rectenna would need to fall in based upon the speed of the climber, the size of the dish, the area of antennas and various other parameters. Important parameter: ε = P out P in Estimate Efficiency: 70 percent Constraints: Input: Microwave Field Size of Dish: 2 meter diameter Base generator: 800 W 5.8 GHz generator Beam: Circularly polarized and directional The following observations can be made about Rectennas - Two things cause microwave signals to weaken o Spreading over a larger sphere of influence o Attenuation due to the atmosphere - Necessary to determine how the field will change in saturation based upon height o Since beam is directional, the beam does not spread and remains constant (same amount of flux) o Attenuation is minimal 1 - Area of dish = A = pi * 1^2 = 3.14 m^2; - ρ µ = 800/3.14 = 254.7 W/m^3 - At first glance, P in = ρ µ * A = 800 Watts - However o Specs of current design base unit = 46.915 mm X 47.26 mm o Area of current design base unit = .00221 m^2 o Area of antenna’s in a base unit = .000581 m^2 o It’s possible to calculate the area of antenna which is exposed to the radiation Ratio of Area of Antenna Design Base to Area of Current Design = .2628 Useable area = A useable = Ratio * A = .825 m^2 Therefore P in = ρ µ * A useable = 210.25 Watts 1 http://www.profc.udec.cl/~gabriel/tutoriales/rsnote/cp3/cp3-2.htm Figure 3.2.1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
ε = .7 With a P out = 147.18 o Moving at 2 m/s with a 25 kg structure total work done by the climber = .5 * 25 * 2^2 = 50 Watts o Therefore if everything works correctly the multiple of the other efficiencies must be greater than .3397 - Brainstormed Solutions o Multiple layers of rectenna, aligned so as to allow the climber to receive microwave on each level - The following observation can be made about the constraints imposed by the capacitors on board o P c .25* m climber gh total o m climber gh total = .25*25*9.8*100 = 6125 J - Power of capacitors can also be represented by t o P c = P out W climber / ε climber dt 0 o From t = 0 to t = 50 o Therefore t 0 P out W climber / ε climber dt 6125 J 0 o If we use v=constant = 2 m/s W climber = 50 J P out = 147.18 J In simplified version, neither is time dependent, therefore max is at when t = 50 0 7359 J 2500 J / ε climber 6125 J 7359 ≤ − 2500/ ε climber ≤ − 1234 .4936 1/ ε climber 2.9436 .3397 ε climber 2.0259 with physical constraints .3397 ε climber 1 This was found earlier by examining a very simple equation o This is a simplified version. If we reintroduce the rectenna efficiency as a variable into the problem things become interesting P out = 210.25* ε rectenna Therefore 0 10512.5 J * ε rectenna 2500 J / ε climber 6125 J Why this is important?
o By allowing both ε rectenna , ε climber

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern