11010_flex2frame

11010_flex2frame - Flexibility II Flexibilty expressed...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Flexibility II Flexibilty expressed through on-orbit servicing Provider and Servicer perspective Upgrading vrs life extension Flexibility and On Orbit Servicing In an interesting paper, Saleh argues that the real value of on-orbit servicing lies in the flexibility that it brings to a space architecture. In particular, he argues having the option to service (or abandon) has value in itself and this value must be accounted for using a real options approach. He also argues that a more persuasive analysis of on orbit serving occurs be breaking apart the servicer and the provider perspective. This was a major breakthrough in understanding how to value flexibility. Nilchiani argues that when flexibility is taken into account as well as performance and cost in a servicing architecture then the choice of an “optimal” servicing architecture is a strong function of the mix of flexibilities that are emphasized. She defines different mixes for commercial versus military space architectures which includes different emphases on fast response
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/08/2011 for the course AERO 16.851 taught by Professor Ldavidmiller during the Fall '03 term at MIT.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online