MIT21A_226F09_q18

MIT21A_226F09_q18 - Nov. 9, 2009 STUDY QUESTIONS ON...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Nov. 9, 2009 STUDY QUESTIONS ON STAVENHAGEN, WHITELEY, LINKE, HILL 1. Stavenhagen and Whiteley present somewhat opposing arguments regarding language rights. Discuss. 2. “An ethnic community without a language is a dying community” (Stavenhagen p. 41). Defend this statement. Oppose it. 3. Stavenhagen says that in most countries, indigenous languages are not given legal recognition, are not used in official administrative and judicial dealings, and are not taught in schools. Argue in favor of extending the state’s recognition of the languages spoken within its borders in these manners. Argue against such legislative and policy changes. 4. Should language rights be considered human rights? What does Stavenhagen say? What does Whiteley say? Who do you agree with more? 5. Why would indigenous organizations refuse to allow the communities they represent to be categorized among “ethnic minorities”? (Stavenhagen p. 42). 6. What is your position vis à vis bilingual education in both Spanish and English? 7. Whitely says that the ideology of language rights is “logocentric and presumes a democratic, secular space of language use” (p. 712).
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 4

MIT21A_226F09_q18 - Nov. 9, 2009 STUDY QUESTIONS ON...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online