RL-Nanoethics-3

RL-Nanoethics-3 - Ethical Theories: Conclusion Nanoethics...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–11. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ethical Theories: Conclusion Nanoethics Lecture III Roderick T. Long Auburn Dept. of Philosophy
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Utilitarianism A consequentialist theory: standard for the rightness of actions is beneficial consequences Differs from ethical egoism (another consequentialist theory) in appealing to beneficial consequences for everybody , not just oneself Claims the virtue of simplicity
Background image of page 2
Utilitarian Simplicity We ordinarily think beneficial results are one ethical consideration among others. Utilitarianism offers to explain the same range of ethical phenomena equally well by appealing solely to such results. This would make it a superior theory – IF in fact it explains them EQUALLY WELL . Does it?
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Remember Our Problem Case for Utilitarianism Five patients need five different organ transplants Should we kill healthy patient and redistribute organs? Clash between ethical theory (might seem to say yes) and particular judgment (no)
Background image of page 4
Three Approaches to Solving Conflicts 1. Top-down: stick with the theory no matter what particular judgments it yields
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Three Approaches to Solving Conflicts 2. Bottom-up: stick with particular judgments no matter what ethical theory they imply
Background image of page 6
Three Approaches to Solving Conflicts 3. Reflective equilibration: mutual adjustment Whatever they may say, in practice philosophers choose RE
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Analogy With Science Top-down science (sticking with theory no matter what observations say) is bad science But bottom-up science is bad too: freshman chemist gets boiling water at 90º Mutual adjustment in science too Difference: philosophy conceptual, not empirical
Background image of page 8
Problem Case for Utilitarianism Three possible moves for utilitarian: 1. Reject utilitarianism (in favor of, say, Kantianism – respecting persons as ends) 2. Bite the bullet (accept killing the patient) 3. Reformulate utilitarianism so as to avoid the undesirable implication
Background image of page 9

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Option 3 Distinguish act- utilitarianism from
Background image of page 10
Image of page 11
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 33

RL-Nanoethics-3 - Ethical Theories: Conclusion Nanoethics...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 11. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online