David Wake - David Wake Summary of problems with claim...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
David Wake Summary of problems with claim: Wake's point is that the term "homology" was coined in a pre-evolutionary context, and that it has proven difficult to construct a definition of homology which fully incorporates what we understand about the evolution of anatomical structures. He argues that we ought to "stop talking about homology" because there are other terms which better capture our current understanding of how phenotypic characters pass from generation to generation. Full discussion: From Exploring Evolution : Faced with the difficulties in explaining anatomical homology, some evolutionary biologists have given up on the notion. They argue that "the only way out of this dilemma is to stop talking about homology." One such biologist, David Wake of the University of California—Berkeley, argues that "homology is not evidence of evolution, nor is it necessary to understand homology in order to accept or understand evolution." EE , p. 49 In the abstract to the paper quoted by Explore Evolution , David Wake explains his concerns
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/08/2011 for the course BIOLOGY BSC1086L taught by Professor Leostouder during the Fall '10 term at Broward College.

Page1 / 2

David Wake - David Wake Summary of problems with claim...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online