VII Akrasia - VII Akrasia Desire Watsons criticisms of...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Watson’s criticisms of Davidson Two aspects of desire: being motivated v. judging best Are these both aspects of desire? What makes the second look desire like? Humberstone’s distinctions In a television documentary about a beauty contest, the winner, newly crowned, wipes away the tears and says: I never realized how much I wanted to win. Presumably she was reflecting not on how much effort she had put in—she already knew that—but on how good it made her feel to have won. ‘Wanting, Getting, Having’ Desire is a cluster concept (cf. the notion of a game). A desire can be strong along three independent dimensions of assessment: 1. How strongly does it motivate you to act? 2. How happy would you be if it were satisfied? 3. How disappointed would you be if it were not satisfied? So, according to Humberstone, there can, for instance, be two desires, of which the first is stronger on dimension 1, but the second is stronger on dimension 2. Likewise for dimensions 1 & Get job (p = .5) — very pleased Successfully cook complicated meal (p = .5) — reasonably pleased Unsuccessfully cook complicated meal (p = .5) — very disappointed Fail to get job (p = .5) — indifferent
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/08/2011 for the course BIOLOGY BSC1086L taught by Professor Leostouder during the Fall '10 term at Broward College.

Page1 / 2

VII Akrasia - VII Akrasia Desire Watsons criticisms of...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online