Possible Objections to the Inference to the Best Explanation ApproachThere are three main reasons, I think, why one might doubt whether the inference to the best explanation approach provides the dualist with a completely satisfactory account of the justification of one's beliefs about other minds. Difficulty 1: Machines and Paralyzed PersonsThe inference to the best explanation approach, at least as set out above, considers only thebehaviorof the organisms in question. Suppose, then, that it turns out that some of the organisms around one, which one has always taken to be humans, are not humans but robots. If the justification for believing in other minds is that the hypothesis of other minds provides the best available explanation of the complex behavior of organisms, then given that the behavior of the robots would be indistinguishable from that of genuine humans, wouldn't one be forced to conclude that it was just as reasonable to attribute minds to the robots as to humans and other biological organisms? But does this agree with one's normal intuitions? Doesn't one normally
This is the end of the preview.
access the rest of the document.
best explanation approach, paralyzed person, explanation approach