Critique of Pure Reas13

Critique of Pure Reas13 - Critique of Pure Reason Lecture...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Critique of Pure Reason Lecture notes, March 12, 1997: Appearance and Thing in Itself Kant's contemporary F. H. Jacobi remarked that Kant could not live without the thing in itself, but at the same time could not live with it. The first half of the remark is correct. Without the distinction between appearances and things in themselves, there is no way to guarantee the possibility of freedom. Freedom is a necessary condition for morality (as explained in the last lecture), and morality is crucial to Kant's overall project. Other of Kant's arguments depend on the distinction. Kant would be unable to accommodate synthetic necessary judgments without being able to restrict their application to appearances, which are subject to the constraints of the human modes of representation. (For a fuller discussion of this point, see the instructor's comments on the first paper topic.) Now it remains to be seen whether Kant can live with the distinction. In my opinion, the question is severely complicated by the lack of agreement about whether Kant
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/09/2011 for the course PSY PSY2012 taught by Professor Scheff during the Fall '09 term at Broward College.

Page1 / 2

Critique of Pure Reas13 - Critique of Pure Reason Lecture...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online