Our competing interests are illustrated below

Our competing interests are illustrated below - The key, of...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Our competing interests are illustrated below.    Variations in the criterion for acceptable hypotheses varies the frequency  of accepting false paradigms and missing correct paradigms. More  stringent criteria are the result of demanding more consistency. Less  stringent criteria attempt to increase detectability by decreasing the  demand for consistency. It is a dilemma. 
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: The key, of course, is what is it that we can do to get the best of both worlds. What factors affect the proper execution of normal science and what factors affect the proper point of paradigm revolution and how do they interrelate. How can we have our cake and eat it, too. The following are ways to increase paradigmatic detectability...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/09/2011 for the course PSY PSY2012 taught by Professor Scheff during the Fall '09 term at Broward College.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online