The problem of choosing to conduct normal science

The problem of choosing to conduct normal science -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The problem of choosing to conduct normal science (E 0.60 to E 0.50) and when to be  the leader of revolutionary science (E 0.60 to A or B 0.50 or 0.60) is more apparent  than real. The articulation of a new paradigm (A or B) is extremely rare and  universally rejected until the existing paradigm is at its maximum capacity (E 0.30)  so that movement to a different paradigm is assured to be in the right direction (E  0.30 to B 0.20). Going from E 0.00 to A 0.50 appears to be a good move but is a dead  end. Movement to paradigm A will not occur when the existing paradigm is at its  limit. E 0.30 to A 0.40 will be an obvious increase in complexity.  Given these problems we can consider those factors which may increase our ability  to know when to abandon the existing paradigm and accept a new paradigm (our  detectability). That is, we can try to identify those totally anomalous but real 
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

The problem of choosing to conduct normal science -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online