A Critique of the Chicago School

A Critique of the Chicago School - . Goode (1997:87-90)...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
A Critique of the Chicago School There is a bias associated with the Chicago school perspective. "Disorganization" uses middle-class points of view. 1. Research that followed the Chicago school found that, in fact, ghetto neighborhoods demonstrate a lot of organization. The kind of organization found in poor neighborhoods, however, is simply different from that found in middle-class neighborhoods. Example: The Role of the Church in Black Communities. 2. Furthermore, many of the activities viewed as deviant in poor communities, were also committed in middle-class suburban areas. Interactionist Perspective: Differential Association Differential association is the first of two Interactionist perspectives
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: . Goode (1997:87-90) contends that Edwin Sutherland's Differential Association Theory is one of the more important theories in the study of deviance. It arose as a critique to those theories that sought biological explanations for deviance. According to differential association theory, people learn to be deviant (see Henslin, 1999:198-99). Goode (1997) maintains that one learns deviance the same as one learns to brush their teeth. People learn to be deviant by associating with people who are deviant. Criminal knowledge, skills, values, traditions, and motives are passed on by word of mouth....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/08/2011 for the course SCIE SYG2000 taught by Professor Bernhardt during the Fall '10 term at Broward College.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online