{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Michael Short Anthro 7 week 2

Michael Short Anthro 7 week 2 - probably full grown and...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Michael Short 803781208 01-12-11 Anthro 7 Week 2 Answers to Questions: 1. A) The plot of offspring’s beak depth against parental beak depth would appear different because of an evolutionary change that is take place in the species. The actual appearance difference in beak depth would entirely depend on what was needed by the species in order to have the best chance for survival. B) Given that there is no hereditary passing down of beak depth the beak depth in the population would clearly vary, but as the generations went on beak depth would continue to trend towards the evolutionary depth that this new plot of offspring is. i) Among adults before a drought beak depth would be not very deep ii) Given that they are the same adults as before the drought their beaks are
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: probably full grown and therefore unable to adapt and change depth easily. iii) Among offspring the depth of the beak would be longer as it would attempt to adapt to the drought that the generation before had struggled with 2. The only reason I can think that it would be beneficial to look like 5% dung rather than 100% dung or 0% dung is that the species or animal looking like 5% dung is less attractive to the predator than the species or animal looking like 0% dung and 100% food as opposed to 5% dung and 95% food. As to the actual effectiveness of this claim I am not extremely confident, due to the fact that it seems animalistic nature would tend to disregard 5% dung....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online