Paltrow+Punishing+Women

Paltrow+Punishing+Women - BRIEFING PAPER Punishing Women...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
BRIEFING PAPER www.reproductiverights.org Punishing Women for Their Behavior During Pregnancy An Approach That Undermines Women’s Health and Children’s Interests For more than a decade, law enforcement personnel, judges, and elected officials nationwide have sought to punish women for their actions during pregnancy which may affect the fetus they’re carrying. 1 Women who are having children despite substance abuse problems have been a particular target, finding themselves prosecuted for such non-existent crimes as “fetal” abuse and delivery of drugs through the umbilical cord. In addition, pregnant women are being civil- ly committed or jailed, and new mothers are losing custody of their children even when they would be capable parents. Meanwhile, state legislators have repeatedly introduced substance abuse and child welfare proposals that would penalize only pregnant women with addiction problems. Some proponents of these efforts are motivated by the misguided belief that they are promot- ing fetal health and protecting children. Others hope to gain legal recognition of “fetal rights” — the premise that a fetus has separate interests that are equal to or greater than those of a pregnant woman. Creation of such rights would require women to subordinate their lives and health — including decisions about reproduction, medical care, and employment — to the fetus. In fact, doctors and hospital officials have already relied on this theory to seek court orders to force pregnant women to undergo cesarean sections or other medical procedures for the alleged benefit of the fetus. 2 Some advocates of fetal rights have argued that children should be able to sue their mothers for “prenatal injuries.” 3 In some industries, employers have adopted “fetal protection” policies, which barred fertile women of childbear- ing age from certain high-paying, unionized jobs. 4 Women’s and children’s advocates agree that women should engage in behaviors that pro- mote the birth of healthy children. Nevertheless, they recognize that a woman’s substance abuse involves complex factors that must be addressed in a constructive manner. Punitive approaches fail to resolve addiction problems and ultimately undermine the health and well- being of women and their children. For this reason, public health groups and medical orga- nizations uniformly oppose measures that treat pregnant women with substance abuse prob- lems as criminals. Moreover, with one notable exception, 5 courts have repeatedly rejected attempts to prosecute women under existing criminal laws for their behavior during pregnan- cy that poses a risk of harm to the fetus, or to coerce women to undergo medical procedures to benefit their fetuses. Some of these decisions have explicitly recognized that the fetal rights theory poses a significant threat to women’s reproductive rights and the best interests of children.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Punishing Women for Their Behavior During Pregnancy 2 September 2000
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/10/2011 for the course POLI SCI 790:395 taught by Professor Daniels during the Spring '11 term at Rutgers.

Page1 / 22

Paltrow+Punishing+Women - BRIEFING PAPER Punishing Women...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online