math_framework1-05

math_framework1-05 - New Wisconsin Promise Conference...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–13. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
New Wisconsin Promise Conference January 11-12, 2005 Monona Terrace Convention Center Madison, Wisconsin
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
A Quality Education for Every Child Understanding the New Assessment System WKCE-CRT Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Office of Educational Accountability Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent January 2005
Background image of page 2
Why is Wisconsin changing its state assessment system?
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
NCLB Requirements Single Statewide  Accountability  System Adequate Yearly Progress Testing Highly Qualified Teachers
Background image of page 4
Adequate Yearly Progress I. Test Participation (95 %) II. Other Indicator Attendance rate for elementary and middle school Graduation rate for high school III. Reading IV. Math Determining Adequate Yearly Progress Based on Full Academic Year Based on total  enrollment
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Adequate Yearly Progress 0 20 40 60 80 100 2 0 1 - 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Reading Math 61% 37% Proficient by 2013-14 = 100% Percent Proficient/Advanced Starting point 2001-02 Accelerated annual gains beginning 2010-11 67.5% 74% 47.5% 58%
Background image of page 6
Adequate Yearly Progress Determine if each subgroup meeting the minimal cell size has met the objective in reading and math. Determining Adequate Yearly Progress Reading Math 61% 37% 100 % Eco Dis. Hispanic LEP White SwD As/ Pac. Black Am. In. (Percent Proficiency) 67.5% 47.5%
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
NCLB Accountability Means More Testing Reading at 3 rd Grade (WRCT) Reading, Language Arts (Writing), Math, Science, and Social Studies at 4, 8, and 10 (WKCE Enhanced) NAEP was optional prior to 02-03 Testing grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and high school (10 th grade) in Reading and Mathematics by 2005-06 NAEP participation required starting 2002-03 Currently we test: ESEA requires: Continued testing grades 4, 8, and 10 in Language Arts, Science, and Social Studies (State Law)
Background image of page 8
W isconsin K nowledge and C oncepts E xaminations C riterion- R eferenced T ests
Background image of page 9

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Beginning in Fall 2005 Grades 3, 4, 5, 6,7,8 and 10 Customized Tests: Reading Mathematics Grades 4, 8, and 10 Enhanced Shelf Tests: Language Arts Science Social Studies All Tested Grades : Alternate Assessments English Language Proficiency Tests
Background image of page 10
WKCE–CRT Customized for Wisconsin Built by Wisconsin educators Based on the Wisconsin Model Academic Standards in Reading and Mathematics Custom descriptors for each tested grade WKCE-CRT begins Fall 2005 Piloted in Wisconsin classrooms
Background image of page 11

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Item Review Panels Developed and edited:
Background image of page 12
Image of page 13
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/11/2011 for the course MATH 112 taught by Professor Jarvis during the Winter '08 term at BYU.

Page1 / 50

math_framework1-05 - New Wisconsin Promise Conference...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 13. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online