1004_ambig_res

1004_ambig_res - Language comprehension Lecture 4:...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–10. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Language comprehension Lecture 4: Ambiguity resolution: Resources; structural frequencies 9.591; 24.945 October 4, 2004 Ted Gibson
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
9.591 Course so far Lecture 1: Experimental methods; Informational constraints affecting sentence comprehension: Lexical frequency, plausibility, context and syntax; Modularity in sentence comprehension. Lecture 2: Resources and sentence complexity. The complexity of unambiguous sentences. Lecture 3: Working memory and sentence comprehension. Lecture 4: Ambiguity resolution: Resources; structural frequencies.
Background image of page 2
Sentence processing: Recap thus far Multiple factors are involved in processing unambiguous sentences and in ambiguity resolution: (a) Syntactic structure; (b) Lexical frequency; (c) Plausibility; (d) Discourse context; (e) Intonation; (f) all information sources are constrained by the amount of working memory resources that are available. ¾ How exactly the factors are represented and processed are open questions: Minimal Attachment & Late Closure vs. Storage and Integration (DLT)? Today: Evidence supporting the DLT in ambiguity resolution ¾ Frequency: What kind of frequency is the human sentence processor sensitive to? What is the time course of information integration? ¾ Modular (syntax-first)? Or non-modular? Is the parser serial or constrained parallel?
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Syntactic information use in sentence processing: The Dependency Locality Theory (DLT, Gibson, 1998, 2000) Resources are required for two aspects of language comprehension: (a) Integration: connecting the current word into the structure built thus far; (b) Storage / Expectations: Predicting categories to complete the current structure.
Background image of page 4
Recap: Locality effects in unambiguous structures Grodner & Gibson (in press) Experiment 1: Object-extracted relative clause: The reporter who the photographer sent to the editor hoped for a good story. Subject-extracted relative clause: The reporter who sent the photographer to the editor hoped for a good story.
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Locality effects in unambiguous structures Object-extracted relative clause: The reporter who the photographer sent to the editor hoped for a story. 1 1 1 2 0 4 0 1 0 0 The reporter who the photographer sent to the editor hoped for 0 1 0 0 1 1+2 0 0 1 4 0
Background image of page 6
Locality effects in unambiguous structures Subject-extracted relative clause: The reporter who sent the photographer to the editor hoped for a story. 1 1 1 0 4 0 1 0 1 The reporter who sent the photographer to the editor hoped for 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 4 0
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Object Extractions 430 RTs DLT 2.5 420 2 410 400 1.5 390 380 1 370 360 0.5 350 340 0 The reporter who the sent to the editor hoped for a good story photographer 430 2.5 Subject Extractions 420 2 410 400 1.5 390 380 1 370 360 0.5 350 340 0 The reporter who sent the to the editor hoped for a good story photographer
Background image of page 8
Reading Time / Word (msec) Experiment 1: DLT vs. RTs (Grodner & Gibson, in press) Linear model: r 2 = .582, p < .001 430 420 410 400 390 380 370 360 350 340 0 0 .
Background image of page 9

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 10
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/11/2011 for the course BIO 9.07 taught by Professor Ruthrosenholtz during the Spring '04 term at MIT.

Page1 / 90

1004_ambig_res - Language comprehension Lecture 4:...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 10. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online