This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: in prose) how they fit your general form (or forms). What are the main ways in which an Empiricist can resist a PSA? Part 2 (2-3 pages) Take one of the PSAs discussed in class and/or in the readings -- e.g. Plato's argument in the Meno, the case for CONSPEC, the argument from early competence in reasoning about object interactions, a Chomskyan argument for innate knowledge of language -- and discuss it in detail. Set out the argument with numbered premises and a conclusion. Is the argument persuasive? If not, say why and explain what sorts of further evidence would tend to reinforce it. If so, say why and explain what sorts of further evidence would tend to undermine it....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 11/11/2011 for the course BIO 9.07 taught by Professor Ruthrosenholtz during the Spring '04 term at MIT.
- Spring '04