Econometric take home APPS_Part_28

Econometric take home APPS_Part_28 - 11. The asymptotic...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
11. The asymptotic variance of the MLE is, in fact, equal to the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound for the variance of a consistent, asymptotically normally distributed estimator, so this completes the argument. In example 4.9, we proposed a regression with a gamma distributed disturbance, y i = α + x i β + ε i where, f ( i ) = [ λ P / Γ ( P )] i P -1 exp(- λ i ), i > 0, λ > 0, P > 2. (The fact that i is nonnegative will shift the constant term, as shown in Example 4.9. The need for the restriction on P will emerge shortly.) It will be convenient to assume the regressors are measured in deviations from their means, so Σ i x i = 0 . The OLS estimator of remains unbiased and consistent in this model, with variance V a r [ b | X ] = σ 2 ( X X ) -1 where σ 2 = Var[ i | X ] = P / λ 2 . [You can show this by using gamma integrals to verify that E [ i | X ] = P / λ and E[ i 2 | X ] = P ( P +1)/ λ 2 . See B-39 and (E-1) in Section E2.3. A useful device for obtaining the variance is Γ ( P ) = ( P -1) Γ ( P -1).] We will now show that in this model, there is a more efficient consistent estimator of . (As we saw in Example 4.9, the constant term in this regression will be biased because E [ i | X ] = P / λ ; a estimates α + P / λ . In what follows, we will focus on the slope estimators. The log likelihood function is L n L = 1 ln ln ( ) ( 1)ln n ii i PP P = λ −Γ + − ε λ ε The likelihood equations are ln L / ∂α = Σ i [-( P -1)/ i + λ ] = 0, ln L / ∂β = Σ i [-( P -1)/ ε i + λ ] x i = 0 , ln L / ∂λ = Σ i [ P / λ - ε i ] = 0, ln L / P = Σ i [ln λ - ψ ( P ) - i ] = 0. The function ψ ( P ) = dln Γ ( P )/d P is defined in Section E2.3.) To show that these expressions have expectation zero, we use the gamma integral once again to show that E [1/ i ] = λ /( P -1). We used the result E [ln i ] = ψ ( P )- λ in Example 15.5. So show that E [ ln L / ∂β ] = 0 , we only require E [1/ i ] = λ /( P -1) because x i and i are independent. The second derivatives and their expectations are found as follows: Using the gamma integral once again, we find E [1/ i 2 ] = λ 2 /[( P -1)( P -2)]. And, recall that Σ i x i = 0 . Thus, conditioned on X , we have - E [ 2 lnL/ ∂α 2 ] = E [ Σ i ( P -1)(1/ i 2 )] = n λ 2 /( P -2), - E [ 2 lnL/ ∂α∂ ] = E [ Σ i ( P -1)(1/ i
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 4

Econometric take home APPS_Part_28 - 11. The asymptotic...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online